<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Obamanomics Will Hurt Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AllanErickson</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22477</link>
		<dc:creator>AllanErickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22477</guid>
		<description>This is a flat out misrepresentation. Of course debt rose under Reagan, and you can argue we didn&#039;t need to rebuild the military and we should have been fine with detante, but the fact is, that while GWB increased the size of government 60%, there was also an increase in revenue to gov&#039;t thanks to tax cuts.  However, Obama has increased government 3x&#039;s already over GWB&#039;s pace, while revenue is dropping in a recession, thereby creating more debt than all president&#039;s combined. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-276675&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-276675&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a flat out misrepresentation. Of course debt rose under Reagan, and you can argue we didn&#39;t need to rebuild the military and we should have been fine with detante, but the fact is, that while GWB increased the size of government 60%, there was also an increase in revenue to gov&#39;t thanks to tax cuts.  However, Obama has increased government 3x&#39;s already over GWB&#39;s pace, while revenue is dropping in a recession, thereby creating more debt than all president&#39;s combined. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-276675" rel="nofollow">http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-276675</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllanErickson</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22476</link>
		<dc:creator>AllanErickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22476</guid>
		<description>This is a flat out misrepresentation. Of course debt rose under Reagan, and you can argue we didn&#039;t need to rebuild the military and we should have been fine with detante, but the fact is, that while GWB increased the size of government 60%, there was also an increase in revenue to gov&#039;t thanks to tax cuts.  However, Obama has increased government 3x&#039;s already over GWB&#039;s pace, while revenue is dropping in a recession, thereby creating more debt than all president&#039;s combined. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-276675&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-276675&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a flat out misrepresentation. Of course debt rose under Reagan, and you can argue we didn&#39;t need to rebuild the military and we should have been fine with detante, but the fact is, that while GWB increased the size of government 60%, there was also an increase in revenue to gov&#39;t thanks to tax cuts.  However, Obama has increased government 3x&#39;s already over GWB&#39;s pace, while revenue is dropping in a recession, thereby creating more debt than all president&#39;s combined. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-276675" rel="nofollow">http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-276675</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Wilkinson is Wearing Free Market Blinders About Innovation &#171; dlPFC</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22475</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Wilkinson is Wearing Free Market Blinders About Innovation &#171; dlPFC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22475</guid>
		<description>[...] that President Obama&#8217;s tax policies will depress &#8220;innovation.&#8221;  It started with this post, linking and quoting this article from the City Journal.  I&#8217;d recommend reading the whole [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that President Obama&#8217;s tax policies will depress &#8220;innovation.&#8221;  It started with this post, linking and quoting this article from the City Journal.  I&#8217;d recommend reading the whole [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Going Galt</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22474</link>
		<dc:creator>On Going Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22474</guid>
		<description>[...] think Obama&#8217;s policies will be bad for innovation, but not because higher marginal tax rates will lead our best and brightest to retire from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think Obama&#8217;s policies will be bad for innovation, but not because higher marginal tax rates will lead our best and brightest to retire from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Going Galt : Pursuing Holiness</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22473</link>
		<dc:creator>On Going Galt : Pursuing Holiness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22473</guid>
		<description>[...] a couple of excellent posts from Will Wilkinson, whose blog I just added to my RSS list.  He&#8217;s got an interesting take [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a couple of excellent posts from Will Wilkinson, whose blog I just added to my RSS list.  He&#8217;s got an interesting take [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uknowbetter</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22472</link>
		<dc:creator>uknowbetter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22472</guid>
		<description>Business starts should probably adjusted for population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business starts should probably adjusted for population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Class &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Big Squelch - Creative Class</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22470</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Class &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Big Squelch - Creative Class</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22470</guid>
		<description>[...] Class Wars?by Richard FloridaFri Mar 6th 2009 at 10:32am ESTThe Big Squelch      Jim Manzi (via Will Wilkinson) lambastes the effects of Obamanomics on innovation:Like the college students who stayed up late to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Class Wars?by Richard FloridaFri Mar 6th 2009 at 10:32am ESTThe Big Squelch      Jim Manzi (via Will Wilkinson) lambastes the effects of Obamanomics on innovation:Like the college students who stayed up late to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Drake</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22471</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22471</guid>
		<description>I see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uknowbetter</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22469</link>
		<dc:creator>uknowbetter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22469</guid>
		<description>Just that dems are even more crooked than repubs.  So expect more crooked nonsense (Burris, Blago, Barney, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just that dems are even more crooked than repubs.  So expect more crooked nonsense (Burris, Blago, Barney, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Manzi</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/04/why-obamanomics-will-hurt-innovation/#comment-22468</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Manzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3060#comment-22468</guid>
		<description>Well, we sure agree on that.   I&#039;ve probably written a book&#039;s worth of material on this point.  It&#039;s why I was so cautious about making a prediction other than &quot;but for&quot; this change, we would see less company formation, and didn;t even try to quantify this difference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think we&#039;re going to end up at way more than a percent or two of difference, btw.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we sure agree on that.   I&#39;ve probably written a book&#39;s worth of material on this point.  It&#39;s why I was so cautious about making a prediction other than &#8220;but for&#8221; this change, we would see less company formation, and didn;t even try to quantify this difference.</p>
<p>I think we&#39;re going to end up at way more than a percent or two of difference, btw.</p>
<p>Best,<br />Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

