<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lump of Liberalism Fallacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lumping Liberals and Libertarians - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22255</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumping Liberals and Libertarians - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22255</guid>
		<description>[...] Will Wilkinson remains on the right track in looking for similarities between (some) liberals and (some) libertarians, while continuing to face objections. He debunks one common objection: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will Wilkinson remains on the right track in looking for similarities between (some) liberals and (some) libertarians, while continuing to face objections. He debunks one common objection: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vangel</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22256</link>
		<dc:creator>Vangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22256</guid>
		<description>Because real libertarians are unlikely to compromise on principle they will always be in opposition.  When the left is in power, the libertarians will agree with the left about the need for the state to respect social liberty but will side with the right and argue for individual liberty and free market (but not corporatism.)  When the right is in power, libertarians will agree about the need for lower taxes and with the need for the state to respect property rights and economic liberty but will side with the left and argue for social liberty.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The facts should be clear to any objective observers; libertarians oppose statism and recognize that the left and right are the opposite side of the same anti-liberty coin.  As such they are destined to be in opposition and to fight for less government involvement no matter which of the two statist parties is in power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because real libertarians are unlikely to compromise on principle they will always be in opposition.  When the left is in power, the libertarians will agree with the left about the need for the state to respect social liberty but will side with the right and argue for individual liberty and free market (but not corporatism.)  When the right is in power, libertarians will agree about the need for lower taxes and with the need for the state to respect property rights and economic liberty but will side with the left and argue for social liberty.  </p>
<p>The facts should be clear to any objective observers; libertarians oppose statism and recognize that the left and right are the opposite side of the same anti-liberty coin.  As such they are destined to be in opposition and to fight for less government involvement no matter which of the two statist parties is in power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Knott</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22257</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Knott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22257</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else remember a WaPo sunday special ... 8 years or so ago ... that talked about the constituant parties within the Dems and Republicans?  I think there were 5 Dem and 4 Rep I think .... and both parties had a &#039;libertarian&#039; wedge .... there are lot of people who say &quot;I don&#039;t like the Democrats trying to take my money AND I don&#039;t like the Republicans trying to take my rights ... I want them BOTH&quot; and who then vote for the group who has pissed them off the least ... or the least recently ... I think that was true then and is still true ... and that&#039;s why the &#039;liberaltarian&#039; project needs to be done ... and why it has a chance for success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else remember a WaPo sunday special &#8230; 8 years or so ago &#8230; that talked about the constituant parties within the Dems and Republicans?  I think there were 5 Dem and 4 Rep I think &#8230;. and both parties had a &#39;libertarian&#39; wedge &#8230;. there are lot of people who say &#8220;I don&#39;t like the Democrats trying to take my money AND I don&#39;t like the Republicans trying to take my rights &#8230; I want them BOTH&#8221; and who then vote for the group who has pissed them off the least &#8230; or the least recently &#8230; I think that was true then and is still true &#8230; and that&#39;s why the &#39;liberaltarian&#39; project needs to be done &#8230; and why it has a chance for success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thacker</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22258</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22258</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that there might be lots of people who are socially liberal, like markets, but think &quot;tax is theft&quot; libertarianism is for crazy people.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that the lots of people who claim to be &quot;socially liberal, like markets, but think &quot;tax is theft&quot; libertarianism is for crazy people&quot; wouldn&#039;t be the kind of people who claim to &quot;like markets,&quot; but can&#039;t name a single case where they&#039;d like more markets or less regulation-- with the possible exception of regulations abolished in the late 70s or early 80s, like on trucking or airlines or long distance, that they don&#039;t want to bring back, or in a few cases where people don&#039;t want to regulate &lt;em&gt;their own&lt;/em&gt; industry but want to regulate everything else.  Not that that isn&#039;t true with social issues as well.  There&#039;s always some reason or excuse to intervene more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, see &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.dynamist.com/weblog/archives/002965.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Virginia Postrel&#039;s comments on liberals, libertarians, and the CPSIA.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;  But finding liberals who oppose any new regulation is almost impossible--no matter what the perverse consequences. My particular bugaboo is housing.  But the CPSIA is another good example.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Libertarians always boast of surveys that show large numbers of people who describe themselves as &quot;socially liberal, fiscally conservative&quot; or whatever.  They ignore that the exceptions fill a room and make the description meaningless in most case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#39;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that there might be lots of people who are socially liberal, like markets, but think &#8220;tax is theft&#8221; libertarianism is for crazy people.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#39;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that the lots of people who claim to be &#8220;socially liberal, like markets, but think &#8220;tax is theft&#8221; libertarianism is for crazy people&#8221; wouldn&#39;t be the kind of people who claim to &#8220;like markets,&#8221; but can&#39;t name a single case where they&#39;d like more markets or less regulation&#8211; with the possible exception of regulations abolished in the late 70s or early 80s, like on trucking or airlines or long distance, that they don&#39;t want to bring back, or in a few cases where people don&#39;t want to regulate <em>their own</em> industry but want to regulate everything else.  Not that that isn&#39;t true with social issues as well.  There&#39;s always some reason or excuse to intervene more.</p>
<p>For example, see <a HREF="http://www.dynamist.com/weblog/archives/002965.html" rel="nofollow">Virginia Postrel&#39;s comments on liberals, libertarians, and the CPSIA.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>  But finding liberals who oppose any new regulation is almost impossible&#8211;no matter what the perverse consequences. My particular bugaboo is housing.  But the CPSIA is another good example.</p></blockquote>
<p>Libertarians always boast of surveys that show large numbers of people who describe themselves as &#8220;socially liberal, fiscally conservative&#8221; or whatever.  They ignore that the exceptions fill a room and make the description meaningless in most case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Moore</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22259</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22259</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that there might be lots of people who are socially liberal, like markets, but think &quot;tax is theft&quot; libertarianism is for crazy people.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think its resistance, I just simply don&#039;t know people who fit into that category.  And I know my own experiences aren&#039;t sufficient, so I look around for people in government, in the media, or on the internet who might fit it.  And I don&#039;t really find many.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you can find many liberals who are fine with markets when they feel things are working well, and will answer surveys to that effect, but really don&#039;t support anything that actually supports that viewpoint.  Sure, these are just my own experiences.  And I truly do apologize if I&#039;ve missed the data that you&#039;ve presented about people who hold socially liberal, pro-market beliefs, but who do not already identify as libertarians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#39;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that there might be lots of people who are socially liberal, like markets, but think &#8220;tax is theft&#8221; libertarianism is for crazy people.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think its resistance, I just simply don&#39;t know people who fit into that category.  And I know my own experiences aren&#39;t sufficient, so I look around for people in government, in the media, or on the internet who might fit it.  And I don&#39;t really find many.  </p>
<p>I think you can find many liberals who are fine with markets when they feel things are working well, and will answer surveys to that effect, but really don&#39;t support anything that actually supports that viewpoint.  Sure, these are just my own experiences.  And I truly do apologize if I&#39;ve missed the data that you&#39;ve presented about people who hold socially liberal, pro-market beliefs, but who do not already identify as libertarians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vangel</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22254</link>
		<dc:creator>Vangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22254</guid>
		<description>Because real libertarians are unlikely to compromise on principle they will always be in opposition.  When the left is in power, the libertarians will agree with the left about the need for the state to respect social liberty but will side with the right and argue for individual liberty and free market (but not corporatism.)  When the right is in power, libertarians will agree about the need for lower taxes and with the need for the state to respect property rights and economic liberty but will side with the left and argue for social liberty.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The facts should be clear to any objective observers; libertarians oppose statism and recognize that the left and right are the opposite side of the same anti-liberty coin.  As such they are destined to be in opposition and to fight for less government involvement no matter which of the two statist parties is in power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because real libertarians are unlikely to compromise on principle they will always be in opposition.  When the left is in power, the libertarians will agree with the left about the need for the state to respect social liberty but will side with the right and argue for individual liberty and free market (but not corporatism.)  When the right is in power, libertarians will agree about the need for lower taxes and with the need for the state to respect property rights and economic liberty but will side with the left and argue for social liberty.  </p>
<p>The facts should be clear to any objective observers; libertarians oppose statism and recognize that the left and right are the opposite side of the same anti-liberty coin.  As such they are destined to be in opposition and to fight for less government involvement no matter which of the two statist parties is in power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Knott</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22253</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Knott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22253</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else remember a WaPo sunday special ... 8 years or so ago ... that talked about the constituant parties within the Dems and Republicans?  I think there were 5 Dem and 4 Rep I think .... and both parties had a &#039;libertarian&#039; wedge .... there are lot of people who say &quot;I don&#039;t like the Democrats trying to take my money AND I don&#039;t like the Republicans trying to take my rights ... I want them BOTH&quot; and who then vote for the group who has pissed them off the least ... or the least recently ... I think that was true then and is still true ... and that&#039;s why the &#039;liberaltarian&#039; project needs to be done ... and why it has a chance for success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else remember a WaPo sunday special &#8230; 8 years or so ago &#8230; that talked about the constituant parties within the Dems and Republicans?  I think there were 5 Dem and 4 Rep I think &#8230;. and both parties had a &#39;libertarian&#39; wedge &#8230;. there are lot of people who say &#8220;I don&#39;t like the Democrats trying to take my money AND I don&#39;t like the Republicans trying to take my rights &#8230; I want them BOTH&#8221; and who then vote for the group who has pissed them off the least &#8230; or the least recently &#8230; I think that was true then and is still true &#8230; and that&#39;s why the &#39;liberaltarian&#39; project needs to be done &#8230; and why it has a chance for success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thacker</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22252</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22252</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that there might be lots of people who are socially liberal, like markets, but think &quot;tax is theft&quot; libertarianism is for crazy people.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that the lots of people who claim to be &quot;socially liberal, like markets, but think &quot;tax is theft&quot; libertarianism is for crazy people&quot; wouldn&#039;t be the kind of people who claim to &quot;like markets,&quot; but can&#039;t name a single case where they&#039;d like more markets or less regulation-- with the possible exception of regulations abolished in the late 70s or early 80s, like on trucking or airlines or long distance, that they don&#039;t want to bring back, or in a few cases where people don&#039;t want to regulate &lt;em&gt;their own&lt;/em&gt; industry but want to regulate everything else.  Not that that isn&#039;t true with social issues as well.  There&#039;s always some reason or excuse to intervene more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, see &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.dynamist.com/weblog/archives/002965.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Virginia Postrel&#039;s comments on liberals, libertarians, and the CPSIA.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;  But finding liberals who oppose any new regulation is almost impossible--no matter what the perverse consequences. My particular bugaboo is housing.  But the CPSIA is another good example.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Libertarians always boast of surveys that show large numbers of people who describe themselves as &quot;socially liberal, fiscally conservative&quot; or whatever.  They ignore that the exceptions fill a room and make the description meaningless in most case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#39;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that there might be lots of people who are socially liberal, like markets, but think &#8220;tax is theft&#8221; libertarianism is for crazy people.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#39;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that the lots of people who claim to be &#8220;socially liberal, like markets, but think &#8220;tax is theft&#8221; libertarianism is for crazy people&#8221; wouldn&#39;t be the kind of people who claim to &#8220;like markets,&#8221; but can&#39;t name a single case where they&#39;d like more markets or less regulation&#8211; with the possible exception of regulations abolished in the late 70s or early 80s, like on trucking or airlines or long distance, that they don&#39;t want to bring back, or in a few cases where people don&#39;t want to regulate <em>their own</em> industry but want to regulate everything else.  Not that that isn&#39;t true with social issues as well.  There&#39;s always some reason or excuse to intervene more.</p>
<p>For example, see <a HREF="http://www.dynamist.com/weblog/archives/002965.html" rel="nofollow">Virginia Postrel&#39;s comments on liberals, libertarians, and the CPSIA.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>  But finding liberals who oppose any new regulation is almost impossible&#8211;no matter what the perverse consequences. My particular bugaboo is housing.  But the CPSIA is another good example.</p></blockquote>
<p>Libertarians always boast of surveys that show large numbers of people who describe themselves as &#8220;socially liberal, fiscally conservative&#8221; or whatever.  They ignore that the exceptions fill a room and make the description meaningless in most case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Moore</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22251</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22251</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that there might be lots of people who are socially liberal, like markets, but think &quot;tax is theft&quot; libertarianism is for crazy people.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think its resistance, I just simply don&#039;t know people who fit into that category.  And I know my own experiences aren&#039;t sufficient, so I look around for people in government, in the media, or on the internet who might fit it.  And I don&#039;t really find many.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you can find many liberals who are fine with markets when they feel things are working well, and will answer surveys to that effect, but really don&#039;t support anything that actually supports that viewpoint.  Sure, these are just my own experiences.  And I truly do apologize if I&#039;ve missed the data that you&#039;ve presented about people who hold socially liberal, pro-market beliefs, but who do not already identify as libertarians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#39;m really struggling to parse resistance to the idea that there might be lots of people who are socially liberal, like markets, but think &#8220;tax is theft&#8221; libertarianism is for crazy people.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think its resistance, I just simply don&#39;t know people who fit into that category.  And I know my own experiences aren&#39;t sufficient, so I look around for people in government, in the media, or on the internet who might fit it.  And I don&#39;t really find many.  </p>
<p>I think you can find many liberals who are fine with markets when they feel things are working well, and will answer surveys to that effect, but really don&#39;t support anything that actually supports that viewpoint.  Sure, these are just my own experiences.  And I truly do apologize if I&#39;ve missed the data that you&#39;ve presented about people who hold socially liberal, pro-market beliefs, but who do not already identify as libertarians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/03/02/the-lump-of-liberalism-fallacy/#comment-22250</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=3020#comment-22250</guid>
		<description>Will, I thought that in your diavlog Jonah asked a good question about whether your political position would be occupied by moderate Republicanism such as Christine Whitman (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.republican-leadership.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.republican-leadership.com&lt;/a&gt;).  I am wondering where your positions would differ from such a group and whether there are enough differences to justify forming an entirely new party/movement around those differences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, I thought that in your diavlog Jonah asked a good question about whether your political position would be occupied by moderate Republicanism such as Christine Whitman (see <a href="http://www.republican-leadership.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.republican-leadership.com</a>).  I am wondering where your positions would differ from such a group and whether there are enough differences to justify forming an entirely new party/movement around those differences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

