<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Managing Expectations Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sachs on the Self-Defeating Stimulus</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/#comment-20698</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachs on the Self-Defeating Stimulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=2731#comment-20698</guid>
		<description>[...] By the way, here&#8217;s my earlier post on &#8220;Managing Expectations Better.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By the way, here&#8217;s my earlier post on &#8220;Managing Expectations Better.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: talboito</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/#comment-20699</link>
		<dc:creator>talboito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=2731#comment-20699</guid>
		<description>I for one welcome our, only indirectly, murderous, auto-econorobotic overlords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one welcome our, only indirectly, murderous, auto-econorobotic overlords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: talboito</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/#comment-20697</link>
		<dc:creator>talboito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=2731#comment-20697</guid>
		<description>I for one welcome our, only indirectly, murderous, auto-econorobotic overlords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one welcome our, only indirectly, murderous, auto-econorobotic overlords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Raphael</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/#comment-20696</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Raphael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=2731#comment-20696</guid>
		<description>I like the idea but have a different reservation: If you make it a standing policy to build the next batch of bridges on some list every time NBER declares a recession, you create a powerful interest group - the bridge builders - in favor of declared recessions. The more specific you get about what is likely to happen, the clearer it is who the specific beneficiaries would be and the easier it is for that group to organize to corrupt the political process in order to get more and longer recessions declared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea but have a different reservation: If you make it a standing policy to build the next batch of bridges on some list every time NBER declares a recession, you create a powerful interest group &#8211; the bridge builders &#8211; in favor of declared recessions. The more specific you get about what is likely to happen, the clearer it is who the specific beneficiaries would be and the easier it is for that group to organize to corrupt the political process in order to get more and longer recessions declared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt C</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/#comment-20695</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=2731#comment-20695</guid>
		<description>It would be better expectation management, but we open up a whole new set of policy questions as to what the auto-stimulus should be.  What if our next recession is not financial in nature, but is a breakdown in healthcare economics?  Would giving money to banks and re-paving highways help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be better expectation management, but we open up a whole new set of policy questions as to what the auto-stimulus should be.  What if our next recession is not financial in nature, but is a breakdown in healthcare economics?  Would giving money to banks and re-paving highways help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Drake</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/#comment-20694</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=2731#comment-20694</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wouldn’t this be better expectation management? &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wouldn’t this be better expectation management? &#8220;</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Farmer</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/#comment-20693</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=2731#comment-20693</guid>
		<description>More than likely, a private insurance plan for down times would be more efficient for allowing people and businesses to plan for recessions. You pay into the plan expecting a periodic recession, a layoff, or a job transition, then you receive a temporary pay-out depending on the plan you purchase. Just like paying for insurance in case you become ill in the future. But this could happen only with a smaller, limited government and much lower taxes so that people could afford to pay for the policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than likely, a private insurance plan for down times would be more efficient for allowing people and businesses to plan for recessions. You pay into the plan expecting a periodic recession, a layoff, or a job transition, then you receive a temporary pay-out depending on the plan you purchase. Just like paying for insurance in case you become ill in the future. But this could happen only with a smaller, limited government and much lower taxes so that people could afford to pay for the policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyK</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/02/07/managing-expectations-better/#comment-20692</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=2731#comment-20692</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a good idea! &lt;br&gt;George W. refused to admit we were in recession for a year after it had started, so it would have been helpful to have some automatic countercyclical policies in place.  Of course, the NBER always calls recessions retrospectively, so even this would be slower than ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a good idea! <br />George W. refused to admit we were in recession for a year after it had started, so it would have been helpful to have some automatic countercyclical policies in place.  Of course, the NBER always calls recessions retrospectively, so even this would be slower than ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

