Comments on: This Week on Free Will: Jonathan Haidt http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/08/this-week-on-free-will-jonathan-haidt/ The Sweet Release of Reason Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000 hourly 1 By: Alana R Biemer http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/08/this-week-on-free-will-jonathan-haidt/#comment-15605 Alana R Biemer Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:05:49 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1489#comment-15605 your blog is great 219 gratz! your blog is great 219 gratz!

]]> By: information on bulimia http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/08/this-week-on-free-will-jonathan-haidt/#comment-15604 information on bulimia Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:46:01 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1489#comment-15604 nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now ;-)<br>keep it up nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now ;-)
keep it up

]]> By: Club Troppo » Missing Link Daily http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/08/this-week-on-free-will-jonathan-haidt/#comment-15599 Club Troppo » Missing Link Daily Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:03:18 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1489#comment-15599 [...] Wilkinson interviews moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt on Bloggingheads TV, and links to his unpublished article on ‘why Democrats should pay more [...] [...] Wilkinson interviews moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt on Bloggingheads TV, and links to his unpublished article on ‘why Democrats should pay more [...]

]]> By: berger http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/08/this-week-on-free-will-jonathan-haidt/#comment-15603 berger Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:58:25 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1489#comment-15603 write this book write this book

]]> By: mk http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/08/this-week-on-free-will-jonathan-haidt/#comment-15602 mk Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:57:22 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1489#comment-15602 In other words, what does "a random sample of the set of all moral questions" look like? How does Haidt obtain this sample? <br><br>I would guess it should be weighted by probability of occurrence; e.g. very prosaic or common moral situations should occur very frequently, and made-up or obviously contrived situations should occur very infrequently. In other words, what does “a random sample of the set of all moral questions” look like? How does Haidt obtain this sample?

I would guess it should be weighted by probability of occurrence; e.g. very prosaic or common moral situations should occur very frequently, and made-up or obviously contrived situations should occur very infrequently.

]]> By: mk http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/08/this-week-on-free-will-jonathan-haidt/#comment-15601 mk Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:51:39 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1489#comment-15601 Indeed, awesome podcast. <br>I'm curious to know more about his methodology. How does he ensure his set of questions, which he uses to determine the fundamental moral emotions, is not biased? E.g. if you ask too many questions about disgust, disgust will look overly important. What is the "right" set of moral questions to perform statistical analysis on? Indeed, awesome podcast.
I'm curious to know more about his methodology. How does he ensure his set of questions, which he uses to determine the fundamental moral emotions, is not biased? E.g. if you ask too many questions about disgust, disgust will look overly important. What is the “right” set of moral questions to perform statistical analysis on?

]]> By: jfcote87 http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/08/this-week-on-free-will-jonathan-haidt/#comment-15600 jfcote87 Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:35:56 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1489#comment-15600 I’m a little skeptical of some of the ingroup claims about liberals and libertarians. Good college educated liberals can be very accepting of a bonobo like culture but may blanche at a purity father-daughter dance held by religious conservatives. I’m curious how well Haidt’s work takes into account the liberal problem of tolerating everyone except the intolerant. It’s hard not to see the “ingroup” (perhaps “outgroup” is a better word) processing in Will’s gleeful description of liberal democracy destroying the radical islam. (I’m gleeful too).<br><br>Great couple of podcasts, and I hope that you can keep mining the last questions regarding liberal culture. I’m a little skeptical of some of the ingroup claims about liberals and libertarians. Good college educated liberals can be very accepting of a bonobo like culture but may blanche at a purity father-daughter dance held by religious conservatives. I’m curious how well Haidt’s work takes into account the liberal problem of tolerating everyone except the intolerant. It’s hard not to see the “ingroup” (perhaps “outgroup” is a better word) processing in Will’s gleeful description of liberal democracy destroying the radical islam. (I’m gleeful too).

Great couple of podcasts, and I hope that you can keep mining the last questions regarding liberal culture.

]]>