Comments on: Barr – Root http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/ The Sweet Release of Reason Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000 hourly 1 By: The GOP’s brand new face « Upturned Earth || John Schwenkler http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14913 The GOP’s brand new face « Upturned Earth || John Schwenkler Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:45:17 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14913 [...] that way, too - but Larison has been every bit as hard on Obama as on McCain, and Wilkinson has indicated that he’ll either vote Barr-Root or not at all. That gives you a maximum of two Obama voters [...] [...] that way, too – but Larison has been every bit as hard on Obama as on McCain, and Wilkinson has indicated that he’ll either vote Barr-Root or not at all. That gives you a maximum of two Obama voters [...]

]]> By: John Combs http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14912 John Combs Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:30:21 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14912 also, Gravel is a terrible candidate for the LP. watching the debate, he seemed to still believe that authority was better at handling most decisions that individuals. also...mary ruwart...very bad for PR for us...never mind why. it's a dead issue now that we need to drop...but if she'd been our candidate...... also, Gravel is a terrible candidate for the LP. watching the debate, he seemed to still believe that authority was better at handling most decisions that individuals.

also…mary ruwart…very bad for PR for us…never mind why. it’s a dead issue now that we need to drop…but if she’d been our candidate……

]]> By: John Combs http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14933 John Combs Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:30:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14933 also, Gravel is a terrible candidate for the LP. watching the debate, he seemed to still believe that authority was better at handling most decisions that individuals. also...mary ruwart...very bad for PR for us...never mind why. it's a dead issue now that we need to drop...but if she'd been our candidate...... also, Gravel is a terrible candidate for the LP. watching the debate, he seemed to still believe that authority was better at handling most decisions that individuals.

also…mary ruwart…very bad for PR for us…never mind why. it’s a dead issue now that we need to drop…but if she’d been our candidate……

]]> By: John Combs http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14911 John Combs Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:27:52 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14911 ayn rand's philosophical point of view is one that i hold very dear to my heart and disagree with only a small amount of issues, all very minor and all issues were ones she herself said she knew little about. and, from an objectivist's point of view of integrity, reason and purpose, i can't believe some of you are seriously judging a candidate based on her prejudices of physical appearance. why didn't she trust men with beards?...probably because she just plain didn't like beards. that's not logic...that's childish. ayn rand’s philosophical point of view is one that i hold very dear to my heart and disagree with only a small amount of issues, all very minor and all issues were ones she herself said she knew little about.

and, from an objectivist’s point of view of integrity, reason and purpose, i can’t believe some of you are seriously judging a candidate based on her prejudices of physical appearance. why didn’t she trust men with beards?…probably because she just plain didn’t like beards. that’s not logic…that’s childish.

]]> By: John Combs http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14932 John Combs Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:27:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14932 ayn rand's philosophical point of view is one that i hold very dear to my heart and disagree with only a small amount of issues, all very minor and all issues were ones she herself said she knew little about. and, from an objectivist's point of view of integrity, reason and purpose, i can't believe some of you are seriously judging a candidate based on her prejudices of physical appearance. why didn't she trust men with beards?...probably because she just plain didn't like beards. that's not logic...that's childish. ayn rand’s philosophical point of view is one that i hold very dear to my heart and disagree with only a small amount of issues, all very minor and all issues were ones she herself said she knew little about.

and, from an objectivist’s point of view of integrity, reason and purpose, i can’t believe some of you are seriously judging a candidate based on her prejudices of physical appearance. why didn’t she trust men with beards?…probably because she just plain didn’t like beards. that’s not logic…that’s childish.

]]> By: John Combs http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14910 John Combs Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:20:32 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14910 Is this supposed to be ironic based on my comment? Libertarians are NOT ultra-conservative. Libertarians are liberal. you're right, they're not ultra-conservative. also, you're wrong. they're not liberal. libertarian was the name of a political point of view long before it was a political party. even thoreau and emerson claimed to be libertarian. so libertarians are libertarians. we came BEFORE conservatism in america as well as liberalism. we are neither and both conservatives and liberals have more in common with each other than either has with libertarians Is this supposed to be ironic based on my comment? Libertarians are NOT ultra-conservative. Libertarians are liberal.

you’re right, they’re not ultra-conservative. also, you’re wrong. they’re not liberal.

libertarian was the name of a political point of view long before it was a political party. even thoreau and emerson claimed to be libertarian.

so libertarians are libertarians. we came BEFORE conservatism in america as well as liberalism. we are neither and both conservatives and liberals have more in common with each other than either has with libertarians

]]> By: John Combs http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14931 John Combs Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:20:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14931 Is this supposed to be ironic based on my comment? Libertarians are NOT ultra-conservative. Libertarians are liberal. you're right, they're not ultra-conservative. also, you're wrong. they're not liberal. libertarian was the name of a political point of view long before it was a political party. even thoreau and emerson claimed to be libertarian. so libertarians are libertarians. we came BEFORE conservatism in america as well as liberalism. we are neither and both conservatives and liberals have more in common with each other than either has with libertarians Is this supposed to be ironic based on my comment? Libertarians are NOT ultra-conservative. Libertarians are liberal.

you’re right, they’re not ultra-conservative. also, you’re wrong. they’re not liberal.

libertarian was the name of a political point of view long before it was a political party. even thoreau and emerson claimed to be libertarian.

so libertarians are libertarians. we came BEFORE conservatism in america as well as liberalism. we are neither and both conservatives and liberals have more in common with each other than either has with libertarians

]]> By: student http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14909 student Mon, 02 Jun 2008 07:32:15 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14909 Gravel is not an economic libertarian AT ALL, When asked about government role in economy, schools, regulation, he kept saying "well, that we can work out." I am practical (I wouldn't abolish welfare or anything, but Gravel is just an old fashioned liberal- socially and economically liberal). Gravel is not an economic libertarian AT ALL, When asked about government role in economy, schools, regulation, he kept saying “well, that we can work out.” I am practical (I wouldn’t abolish welfare or anything, but Gravel is just an old fashioned liberal- socially and economically liberal).

]]> By: student http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14930 student Mon, 02 Jun 2008 07:32:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14930 Gravel is not an economic libertarian AT ALL, When asked about government role in economy, schools, regulation, he kept saying "well, that we can work out." I am practical (I wouldn't abolish welfare or anything, but Gravel is just an old fashioned liberal- socially and economically liberal). Gravel is not an economic libertarian AT ALL, When asked about government role in economy, schools, regulation, he kept saying “well, that we can work out.” I am practical (I wouldn’t abolish welfare or anything, but Gravel is just an old fashioned liberal- socially and economically liberal).

]]> By: Hugh http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14908 Hugh Fri, 30 May 2008 03:21:04 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14908 I've never seen him look into the camera. (at least on still photos) He looks like a Realtor or car salesman. Ayn Rand had a BIG distrust of beards and mustaches, not a mild distrust. I’ve never seen him look into the camera. (at least on still photos) He looks like a Realtor or car salesman. Ayn Rand had a BIG distrust of beards and mustaches, not a mild distrust.

]]>