<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barr &#8211; Root</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The GOP&#8217;s brand new face &#171; Upturned Earth &#124;&#124; John Schwenkler</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14913</link>
		<dc:creator>The GOP&#8217;s brand new face &#171; Upturned Earth &#124;&#124; John Schwenkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14913</guid>
		<description>[...] that way, too - but Larison has been every bit as hard on Obama as on McCain, and Wilkinson has indicated that he&#8217;ll either vote Barr-Root or not at all. That gives you a maximum of two Obama voters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that way, too &#8211; but Larison has been every bit as hard on Obama as on McCain, and Wilkinson has indicated that he&#8217;ll either vote Barr-Root or not at all. That gives you a maximum of two Obama voters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Combs</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14912</link>
		<dc:creator>John Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14912</guid>
		<description>also, Gravel is a terrible candidate for the LP.  watching the debate, he seemed to still believe that authority was better at handling most decisions that individuals.

also...mary ruwart...very bad for PR for us...never mind why.  it&#039;s a dead issue now that we need to drop...but if she&#039;d been our candidate......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, Gravel is a terrible candidate for the LP.  watching the debate, he seemed to still believe that authority was better at handling most decisions that individuals.</p>
<p>also&#8230;mary ruwart&#8230;very bad for PR for us&#8230;never mind why.  it&#8217;s a dead issue now that we need to drop&#8230;but if she&#8217;d been our candidate&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Combs</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14933</link>
		<dc:creator>John Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14933</guid>
		<description>also, Gravel is a terrible candidate for the LP.  watching the debate, he seemed to still believe that authority was better at handling most decisions that individuals.

also...mary ruwart...very bad for PR for us...never mind why.  it&#039;s a dead issue now that we need to drop...but if she&#039;d been our candidate......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, Gravel is a terrible candidate for the LP.  watching the debate, he seemed to still believe that authority was better at handling most decisions that individuals.</p>
<p>also&#8230;mary ruwart&#8230;very bad for PR for us&#8230;never mind why.  it&#8217;s a dead issue now that we need to drop&#8230;but if she&#8217;d been our candidate&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Combs</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14911</link>
		<dc:creator>John Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14911</guid>
		<description>ayn rand&#039;s philosophical point of view is one that i hold very dear to my heart and disagree with only a small amount of issues, all very minor and all issues were ones she herself said she knew little about.

and, from an objectivist&#039;s point of view of integrity, reason and purpose, i can&#039;t believe some of you are seriously judging a candidate based on her prejudices of physical appearance.  why didn&#039;t she trust men with beards?...probably because she just plain didn&#039;t like beards.  that&#039;s not logic...that&#039;s childish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ayn rand&#8217;s philosophical point of view is one that i hold very dear to my heart and disagree with only a small amount of issues, all very minor and all issues were ones she herself said she knew little about.</p>
<p>and, from an objectivist&#8217;s point of view of integrity, reason and purpose, i can&#8217;t believe some of you are seriously judging a candidate based on her prejudices of physical appearance.  why didn&#8217;t she trust men with beards?&#8230;probably because she just plain didn&#8217;t like beards.  that&#8217;s not logic&#8230;that&#8217;s childish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Combs</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14932</link>
		<dc:creator>John Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14932</guid>
		<description>ayn rand&#039;s philosophical point of view is one that i hold very dear to my heart and disagree with only a small amount of issues, all very minor and all issues were ones she herself said she knew little about.

and, from an objectivist&#039;s point of view of integrity, reason and purpose, i can&#039;t believe some of you are seriously judging a candidate based on her prejudices of physical appearance.  why didn&#039;t she trust men with beards?...probably because she just plain didn&#039;t like beards.  that&#039;s not logic...that&#039;s childish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ayn rand&#8217;s philosophical point of view is one that i hold very dear to my heart and disagree with only a small amount of issues, all very minor and all issues were ones she herself said she knew little about.</p>
<p>and, from an objectivist&#8217;s point of view of integrity, reason and purpose, i can&#8217;t believe some of you are seriously judging a candidate based on her prejudices of physical appearance.  why didn&#8217;t she trust men with beards?&#8230;probably because she just plain didn&#8217;t like beards.  that&#8217;s not logic&#8230;that&#8217;s childish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Combs</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14910</link>
		<dc:creator>John Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14910</guid>
		<description>Is this supposed to be ironic based on my comment? Libertarians are NOT ultra-conservative. Libertarians are liberal.

you&#039;re right, they&#039;re not ultra-conservative.  also, you&#039;re wrong.  they&#039;re not liberal.

libertarian was the name of a political point of view long before it was a political party.  even thoreau and emerson claimed to be libertarian.

so libertarians are libertarians.  we came BEFORE conservatism in america as well as liberalism.  we are neither and both conservatives and liberals have more in common with each other than either has with libertarians</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this supposed to be ironic based on my comment? Libertarians are NOT ultra-conservative. Libertarians are liberal.</p>
<p>you&#8217;re right, they&#8217;re not ultra-conservative.  also, you&#8217;re wrong.  they&#8217;re not liberal.</p>
<p>libertarian was the name of a political point of view long before it was a political party.  even thoreau and emerson claimed to be libertarian.</p>
<p>so libertarians are libertarians.  we came BEFORE conservatism in america as well as liberalism.  we are neither and both conservatives and liberals have more in common with each other than either has with libertarians</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Combs</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14931</link>
		<dc:creator>John Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14931</guid>
		<description>Is this supposed to be ironic based on my comment? Libertarians are NOT ultra-conservative. Libertarians are liberal.

you&#039;re right, they&#039;re not ultra-conservative.  also, you&#039;re wrong.  they&#039;re not liberal.

libertarian was the name of a political point of view long before it was a political party.  even thoreau and emerson claimed to be libertarian.

so libertarians are libertarians.  we came BEFORE conservatism in america as well as liberalism.  we are neither and both conservatives and liberals have more in common with each other than either has with libertarians</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this supposed to be ironic based on my comment? Libertarians are NOT ultra-conservative. Libertarians are liberal.</p>
<p>you&#8217;re right, they&#8217;re not ultra-conservative.  also, you&#8217;re wrong.  they&#8217;re not liberal.</p>
<p>libertarian was the name of a political point of view long before it was a political party.  even thoreau and emerson claimed to be libertarian.</p>
<p>so libertarians are libertarians.  we came BEFORE conservatism in america as well as liberalism.  we are neither and both conservatives and liberals have more in common with each other than either has with libertarians</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: student</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14909</link>
		<dc:creator>student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 07:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14909</guid>
		<description>Gravel is not an economic libertarian AT ALL, When asked about government role in economy, schools, regulation, he kept saying &quot;well, that we can work out.&quot; I am practical (I wouldn&#039;t abolish welfare or anything, but Gravel is just an old fashioned liberal- socially and economically liberal).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gravel is not an economic libertarian AT ALL, When asked about government role in economy, schools, regulation, he kept saying &#8220;well, that we can work out.&#8221; I am practical (I wouldn&#8217;t abolish welfare or anything, but Gravel is just an old fashioned liberal- socially and economically liberal).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: student</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14930</link>
		<dc:creator>student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 07:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14930</guid>
		<description>Gravel is not an economic libertarian AT ALL, When asked about government role in economy, schools, regulation, he kept saying &quot;well, that we can work out.&quot; I am practical (I wouldn&#039;t abolish welfare or anything, but Gravel is just an old fashioned liberal- socially and economically liberal).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gravel is not an economic libertarian AT ALL, When asked about government role in economy, schools, regulation, he kept saying &#8220;well, that we can work out.&#8221; I am practical (I wouldn&#8217;t abolish welfare or anything, but Gravel is just an old fashioned liberal- socially and economically liberal).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14908</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 03:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14908</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never seen him look into the camera. (at least on still photos)  He looks like a Realtor or car salesman.  Ayn Rand had a BIG distrust of beards and mustaches, not a mild distrust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen him look into the camera. (at least on still photos)  He looks like a Realtor or car salesman.  Ayn Rand had a BIG distrust of beards and mustaches, not a mild distrust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14920</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14920</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never seen him look into the camera. (at least on still photos)  He looks like a Realtor or car salesman.  Ayn Rand had a BIG distrust of beards and mustaches, not a mild distrust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen him look into the camera. (at least on still photos)  He looks like a Realtor or car salesman.  Ayn Rand had a BIG distrust of beards and mustaches, not a mild distrust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wootendw</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14907</link>
		<dc:creator>wootendw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14907</guid>
		<description>Ayn Rand had, at most, a mild mistrust of some men with beards. And Barr looks directly into the camera when he has something to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayn Rand had, at most, a mild mistrust of some men with beards. And Barr looks directly into the camera when he has something to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wootendw</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14925</link>
		<dc:creator>wootendw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14925</guid>
		<description>Ayn Rand had, at most, a mild mistrust of some men with beards. And Barr looks directly into the camera when he has something to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayn Rand had, at most, a mild mistrust of some men with beards. And Barr looks directly into the camera when he has something to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14906</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14906</guid>
		<description>There is no question, at least to me, that if Ayn Rand had never been born, there would be no Libertarian party.

Ayn Rand was known to NEVER trust anyone with a mustache or beard. I&#039;m not sure of the validity of this, but looking at Barr and his sideways glances at the camera in many of his photos, his cattiness brought back these thoughts.  In my mind, he looks like a crook.

Shave and have the guts to look at the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no question, at least to me, that if Ayn Rand had never been born, there would be no Libertarian party.</p>
<p>Ayn Rand was known to NEVER trust anyone with a mustache or beard. I&#8217;m not sure of the validity of this, but looking at Barr and his sideways glances at the camera in many of his photos, his cattiness brought back these thoughts.  In my mind, he looks like a crook.</p>
<p>Shave and have the guts to look at the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/25/barr-root/#comment-14921</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1466#comment-14921</guid>
		<description>There is no question, at least to me, that if Ayn Rand had never been born, there would be no Libertarian party.

Ayn Rand was known to NEVER trust anyone with a mustache or beard. I&#039;m not sure of the validity of this, but looking at Barr and his sideways glances at the camera in many of his photos, his cattiness brought back these thoughts.  In my mind, he looks like a crook.

Shave and have the guts to look at the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no question, at least to me, that if Ayn Rand had never been born, there would be no Libertarian party.</p>
<p>Ayn Rand was known to NEVER trust anyone with a mustache or beard. I&#8217;m not sure of the validity of this, but looking at Barr and his sideways glances at the camera in many of his photos, his cattiness brought back these thoughts.  In my mind, he looks like a crook.</p>
<p>Shave and have the guts to look at the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

