<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Cassidy on Libertarian Paternalism: Way Too Libertarian!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Celebrity Sunglasses</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14875</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrity Sunglasses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14875</guid>
		<description>Great post.. and I agree with you.. &quot;Anyway, the gist here is that John Cassidy is the guy Jonah Goldberg is trying to warn you about.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.. and I agree with you.. &#8220;Anyway, the gist here is that John Cassidy is the guy Jonah Goldberg is trying to warn you about.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live lead transfer</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14874</link>
		<dc:creator>Live lead transfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14874</guid>
		<description>I agree with your last paragraph.. Behavioral economics, by demonstrating how people often fall victim to confusion, myopia, and trend following, provides another convincing ratio-nale for Keynesian policies, but you wouldn’t realize that from reading Thaler and Sunstein. Great post..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your last paragraph.. Behavioral economics, by demonstrating how people often fall victim to confusion, myopia, and trend following, provides another convincing ratio-nale for Keynesian policies, but you wouldn’t realize that from reading Thaler and Sunstein. Great post..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Shirley</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14873</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14873</guid>
		<description>your blog is great 684 gratz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your blog is great 684 gratz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link Daily</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14872</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14872</guid>
		<description>[...] Wilkinson has a neat libertarian rejoinder for a journo who berates Cass Sunstein&#8217;s &#8220;libertarian paternalism&#8221; for being insufficiently [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wilkinson has a neat libertarian rejoinder for a journo who berates Cass Sunstein&#8217;s &#8220;libertarian paternalism&#8221; for being insufficiently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adina</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14871</link>
		<dc:creator>adina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 07:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14871</guid>
		<description>It is true that people often make woefully mistaken decisions and statements. Therefore, we should use our benevolent government to restrict Cassidy&#039;s writing priveleges- for his own good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that people often make woefully mistaken decisions and statements. Therefore, we should use our benevolent government to restrict Cassidy&#8217;s writing priveleges- for his own good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adina</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14891</link>
		<dc:creator>adina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 07:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14891</guid>
		<description>It is true that people often make woefully mistaken decisions and statements. Therefore, we should use our benevolent government to restrict Cassidy&#039;s writing priveleges- for his own good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that people often make woefully mistaken decisions and statements. Therefore, we should use our benevolent government to restrict Cassidy&#8217;s writing priveleges- for his own good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hertzlinger</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14870</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hertzlinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14870</guid>
		<description>The theory that human irrationality means more decisions should be made by state officials only makes sense if you think said officials aren&#039;t human.

Clearly, Cassidy is saying &quot;I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theory that human irrationality means more decisions should be made by state officials only makes sense if you think said officials aren&#8217;t human.</p>
<p>Clearly, Cassidy is saying &#8220;I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hertzlinger</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14888</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hertzlinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14888</guid>
		<description>The theory that human irrationality means more decisions should be made by state officials only makes sense if you think said officials aren&#039;t human.

Clearly, Cassidy is saying &quot;I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theory that human irrationality means more decisions should be made by state officials only makes sense if you think said officials aren&#8217;t human.</p>
<p>Clearly, Cassidy is saying &#8220;I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 03:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14869</guid>
		<description>Oh the irony! At the bottom of this page, as I write, is a Google ad for &quot;Free Government Grants&quot; that promises &quot;Billions Available. Never Repay!&quot;  This is the problem that the modern libertarian faces.  We have to realize that Big Government is here, at least until the next revolution.  We have Big Government because people want Big Government.  We want a government that will dispense &quot;free government grants&quot;.  And yet we are jealous of our liberties and we inherently recognize that Big Government = Fewer Liberties.  So this &quot;libertarian paternalism&quot; seems like a way to chart a &quot;real&quot; Third Way, as the authors suggest, between oppressive nanny-state-ism (incompatible with our liberties) and complete pure libertarian laissez-faire economics (incompatible with our lust for government grants).  But at the same time it sounds a lot like &quot;compassionate conservatism&quot; and we see how well &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; fared over the last 8 years.  So I&#039;m simultaneously optimistic and pessimistic about this idea.  I&#039;ll definitely read the book now, so I guess I can thank Cassidy for something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh the irony! At the bottom of this page, as I write, is a Google ad for &#8220;Free Government Grants&#8221; that promises &#8220;Billions Available. Never Repay!&#8221;  This is the problem that the modern libertarian faces.  We have to realize that Big Government is here, at least until the next revolution.  We have Big Government because people want Big Government.  We want a government that will dispense &#8220;free government grants&#8221;.  And yet we are jealous of our liberties and we inherently recognize that Big Government = Fewer Liberties.  So this &#8220;libertarian paternalism&#8221; seems like a way to chart a &#8220;real&#8221; Third Way, as the authors suggest, between oppressive nanny-state-ism (incompatible with our liberties) and complete pure libertarian laissez-faire economics (incompatible with our lust for government grants).  But at the same time it sounds a lot like &#8220;compassionate conservatism&#8221; and we see how well <i>that</i> fared over the last 8 years.  So I&#8217;m simultaneously optimistic and pessimistic about this idea.  I&#8217;ll definitely read the book now, so I guess I can thank Cassidy for something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/05/23/john-cassidy-on-libertarian-paternalism-way-too-libertarian/#comment-14890</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=1465#comment-14890</guid>
		<description>Oh the irony! At the bottom of this page, as I write, is a Google ad for &quot;Free Government Grants&quot; that promises &quot;Billions Available. Never Repay!&quot;  This is the problem that the modern libertarian faces.  We have to realize that Big Government is here, at least until the next revolution.  We have Big Government because people want Big Government.  We want a government that will dispense &quot;free government grants&quot;.  And yet we are jealous of our liberties and we inherently recognize that Big Government = Fewer Liberties.  So this &quot;libertarian paternalism&quot; seems like a way to chart a &quot;real&quot; Third Way, as the authors suggest, between oppressive nanny-state-ism (incompatible with our liberties) and complete pure libertarian laissez-faire economics (incompatible with our lust for government grants).  But at the same time it sounds a lot like &quot;compassionate conservatism&quot; and we see how well &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; fared over the last 8 years.  So I&#039;m simultaneously optimistic and pessimistic about this idea.  I&#039;ll definitely read the book now, so I guess I can thank Cassidy for something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh the irony! At the bottom of this page, as I write, is a Google ad for &#8220;Free Government Grants&#8221; that promises &#8220;Billions Available. Never Repay!&#8221;  This is the problem that the modern libertarian faces.  We have to realize that Big Government is here, at least until the next revolution.  We have Big Government because people want Big Government.  We want a government that will dispense &#8220;free government grants&#8221;.  And yet we are jealous of our liberties and we inherently recognize that Big Government = Fewer Liberties.  So this &#8220;libertarian paternalism&#8221; seems like a way to chart a &#8220;real&#8221; Third Way, as the authors suggest, between oppressive nanny-state-ism (incompatible with our liberties) and complete pure libertarian laissez-faire economics (incompatible with our lust for government grants).  But at the same time it sounds a lot like &#8220;compassionate conservatism&#8221; and we see how well <i>that</i> fared over the last 8 years.  So I&#8217;m simultaneously optimistic and pessimistic about this idea.  I&#8217;ll definitely read the book now, so I guess I can thank Cassidy for something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

