<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better to Be Richer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link Daily</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12738</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Troppo &#187; Missing Link Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12738</guid>
		<description>[...] Wilkinson looks at a recent happiness study which seems at least partly to contradict earlier happiness research relied on by neo-socialist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wilkinson looks at a recent happiness study which seems at least partly to contradict earlier happiness research relied on by neo-socialist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanFranciscoJim</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12737</link>
		<dc:creator>SanFranciscoJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12737</guid>
		<description>Actually, numerous studies, by different methodologies, have uncovered the Venezuela &quot;anomaly.&quot; Large income disparities tend to lower overall happiness, though that is obviously not giving Brazil too much trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, numerous studies, by different methodologies, have uncovered the Venezuela &#8220;anomaly.&#8221; Large income disparities tend to lower overall happiness, though that is obviously not giving Brazil too much trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanFranciscoJim</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12743</link>
		<dc:creator>SanFranciscoJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12743</guid>
		<description>Actually, numerous studies, by different methodologies, have uncovered the Venezuela &quot;anomaly.&quot; Large income disparities tend to lower overall happiness, though that is obviously not giving Brazil too much trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, numerous studies, by different methodologies, have uncovered the Venezuela &#8220;anomaly.&#8221; Large income disparities tend to lower overall happiness, though that is obviously not giving Brazil too much trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12736</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12736</guid>
		<description>I noticed the Venezuela thing too.  I also noticed that Hong Kong looks unhappy for its wealth.

Rather than thinking that some countries are doing much better and worse with their wealth, I suspect that the data collection methods leave something to be desired when one wants to compare across countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the Venezuela thing too.  I also noticed that Hong Kong looks unhappy for its wealth.</p>
<p>Rather than thinking that some countries are doing much better and worse with their wealth, I suspect that the data collection methods leave something to be desired when one wants to compare across countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GilM</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12746</link>
		<dc:creator>GilM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12746</guid>
		<description>I noticed the Venezuela thing too.  I also noticed that Hong Kong looks unhappy for its wealth.

Rather than thinking that some countries are doing much better and worse with their wealth, I suspect that the data collection methods leave something to be desired when one wants to compare across countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the Venezuela thing too.  I also noticed that Hong Kong looks unhappy for its wealth.</p>
<p>Rather than thinking that some countries are doing much better and worse with their wealth, I suspect that the data collection methods leave something to be desired when one wants to compare across countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12735</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12735</guid>
		<description>Every time you post something like this, you should reiterate your point (made in prior posts) that the appearance of diminishing returns could be explained by the mapping of an infinite scale (income) against a finite scale (satisfaction with an upper bound).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time you post something like this, you should reiterate your point (made in prior posts) that the appearance of diminishing returns could be explained by the mapping of an infinite scale (income) against a finite scale (satisfaction with an upper bound).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12742</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12742</guid>
		<description>Every time you post something like this, you should reiterate your point (made in prior posts) that the appearance of diminishing returns could be explained by the mapping of an infinite scale (income) against a finite scale (satisfaction with an upper bound).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time you post something like this, you should reiterate your point (made in prior posts) that the appearance of diminishing returns could be explained by the mapping of an infinite scale (income) against a finite scale (satisfaction with an upper bound).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12734</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12734</guid>
		<description>Looks like Venezuela is beating us in satisfaction despite a much lower GDP per person.  Just think what Hugo could do with our GDP.  Hugo Chavez for President!  Anyone with me?  Will?

I&#039;m kidding but it struck me as the most jarring piece of info on that graph.  I&#039;d also point out that Deaton makes the findings sound more directly proportional than they appear to me when looking at that graph.  The Venezuela/U.S. comparison being the most drastic.  When I look at it, it seems clear that some nations are much better at utilizing their GDP than others and the U.S. comes out pretty poor in that regard, perhaps due to a law of diminishing returns or because our GDP distribution policies are crappy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Venezuela is beating us in satisfaction despite a much lower GDP per person.  Just think what Hugo could do with our GDP.  Hugo Chavez for President!  Anyone with me?  Will?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kidding but it struck me as the most jarring piece of info on that graph.  I&#8217;d also point out that Deaton makes the findings sound more directly proportional than they appear to me when looking at that graph.  The Venezuela/U.S. comparison being the most drastic.  When I look at it, it seems clear that some nations are much better at utilizing their GDP than others and the U.S. comes out pretty poor in that regard, perhaps due to a law of diminishing returns or because our GDP distribution policies are crappy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12745</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12745</guid>
		<description>Looks like Venezuela is beating us in satisfaction despite a much lower GDP per person.  Just think what Hugo could do with our GDP.  Hugo Chavez for President!  Anyone with me?  Will?

I&#039;m kidding but it struck me as the most jarring piece of info on that graph.  I&#039;d also point out that Deaton makes the findings sound more directly proportional than they appear to me when looking at that graph.  The Venezuela/U.S. comparison being the most drastic.  When I look at it, it seems clear that some nations are much better at utilizing their GDP than others and the U.S. comes out pretty poor in that regard, perhaps due to a law of diminishing returns or because our GDP distribution policies are crappy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Venezuela is beating us in satisfaction despite a much lower GDP per person.  Just think what Hugo could do with our GDP.  Hugo Chavez for President!  Anyone with me?  Will?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kidding but it struck me as the most jarring piece of info on that graph.  I&#8217;d also point out that Deaton makes the findings sound more directly proportional than they appear to me when looking at that graph.  The Venezuela/U.S. comparison being the most drastic.  When I look at it, it seems clear that some nations are much better at utilizing their GDP than others and the U.S. comes out pretty poor in that regard, perhaps due to a law of diminishing returns or because our GDP distribution policies are crappy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12733</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12733</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Togolese, by the way, just in case you were wondering how to put that phrase.  In the same way that people who live in Congo are Congolese.

Your point about relativity is a good one although I think regardless of that, money makes you more comortable and arguably therefore happier regardless of what&#039;s going on in other countries.

I&#039;d also like to see a bar chart with the different religions also, i.e.countries that are predominantly Christian in one bar, Muslim in another bar, etc. and then compare that with happiness and then find a way to mix GDP in there somehow.

But in the end the eternal question will always be, which is the cause and which is the effect?  Did happiness cause production, did production cause religion, did religion cause happiness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Togolese, by the way, just in case you were wondering how to put that phrase.  In the same way that people who live in Congo are Congolese.</p>
<p>Your point about relativity is a good one although I think regardless of that, money makes you more comortable and arguably therefore happier regardless of what&#8217;s going on in other countries.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to see a bar chart with the different religions also, i.e.countries that are predominantly Christian in one bar, Muslim in another bar, etc. and then compare that with happiness and then find a way to mix GDP in there somehow.</p>
<p>But in the end the eternal question will always be, which is the cause and which is the effect?  Did happiness cause production, did production cause religion, did religion cause happiness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12744</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12744</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Togolese, by the way, just in case you were wondering how to put that phrase.  In the same way that people who live in Congo are Congolese.

Your point about relativity is a good one although I think regardless of that, money makes you more comortable and arguably therefore happier regardless of what&#039;s going on in other countries.

I&#039;d also like to see a bar chart with the different religions also, i.e.countries that are predominantly Christian in one bar, Muslim in another bar, etc. and then compare that with happiness and then find a way to mix GDP in there somehow.

But in the end the eternal question will always be, which is the cause and which is the effect?  Did happiness cause production, did production cause religion, did religion cause happiness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Togolese, by the way, just in case you were wondering how to put that phrase.  In the same way that people who live in Congo are Congolese.</p>
<p>Your point about relativity is a good one although I think regardless of that, money makes you more comortable and arguably therefore happier regardless of what&#8217;s going on in other countries.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to see a bar chart with the different religions also, i.e.countries that are predominantly Christian in one bar, Muslim in another bar, etc. and then compare that with happiness and then find a way to mix GDP in there somehow.</p>
<p>But in the end the eternal question will always be, which is the cause and which is the effect?  Did happiness cause production, did production cause religion, did religion cause happiness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JA</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12732</link>
		<dc:creator>JA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12732</guid>
		<description>Did it again.  KAHNEMAN.  It&#039;s Kahneman, even though the link says Kahnemann.

Mi dispiace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did it again.  KAHNEMAN.  It&#8217;s Kahneman, even though the link says Kahnemann.</p>
<p>Mi dispiace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JA</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12747</link>
		<dc:creator>JA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12747</guid>
		<description>Did it again.  KAHNEMAN.  It&#039;s Kahneman, even though the link says Kahnemann.

Mi dispiace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did it again.  KAHNEMAN.  It&#8217;s Kahneman, even though the link says Kahnemann.</p>
<p>Mi dispiace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JA</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12731</link>
		<dc:creator>JA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12731</guid>
		<description>Kahnemann, natch.  heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kahnemann, natch.  heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JA</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12741</link>
		<dc:creator>JA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/07/better-to-be-richer/#comment-12741</guid>
		<description>Kahnemann, natch.  heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kahnemann, natch.  heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

