<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Brooks and the Infrastructure of Technocratic Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12306</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12306</guid>
		<description>Hey Kip, FYI, I wrote about that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2008/02/equality_before_the_law_as_arm.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kip, FYI, I wrote about that <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2008/02/equality_before_the_law_as_arm.cfm" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12316</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12316</guid>
		<description>Hey Kip, FYI, I wrote about that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2008/02/equality_before_the_law_as_arm.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kip, FYI, I wrote about that <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2008/02/equality_before_the_law_as_arm.cfm" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipEsquire</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12305</link>
		<dc:creator>KipEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12305</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;if, say, more women spend more time in the kitchen, pregnant, rather than competing for social esteem on an equal footing with men, then the state is ready with its managerial tools to reshape our incentives&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://kipesquire.powerblogs.com/posts/1203123034.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yup&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;if, say, more women spend more time in the kitchen, pregnant, rather than competing for social esteem on an equal footing with men, then the state is ready with its managerial tools to reshape our incentives&#8221;</i></p>
<p><a href="http://kipesquire.powerblogs.com/posts/1203123034.shtml" rel="nofollow">Yup</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipEsquire</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12315</link>
		<dc:creator>KipEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12315</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;if, say, more women spend more time in the kitchen, pregnant, rather than competing for social esteem on an equal footing with men, then the state is ready with its managerial tools to reshape our incentives&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://kipesquire.powerblogs.com/posts/1203123034.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yup&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;if, say, more women spend more time in the kitchen, pregnant, rather than competing for social esteem on an equal footing with men, then the state is ready with its managerial tools to reshape our incentives&#8221;</i><br />
<a href="http://kipesquire.powerblogs.com/posts/1203123034.shtml" rel="nofollow">Yup</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGGP</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12304</link>
		<dc:creator>TGGP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12304</guid>
		<description>Mencius, goodness is normative. Social science tends to follow the lines of Milton Friedman&#039;s &quot;Essays in Positive Economics&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mencius, goodness is normative. Social science tends to follow the lines of Milton Friedman&#8217;s &#8220;Essays in Positive Economics&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGGP</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12314</link>
		<dc:creator>TGGP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12314</guid>
		<description>Mencius, goodness is normative. Social science tends to follow the lines of Milton Friedman&#039;s &quot;Essays in Positive Economics&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mencius, goodness is normative. Social science tends to follow the lines of Milton Friedman&#8217;s &#8220;Essays in Positive Economics&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wph</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12303</link>
		<dc:creator>wph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12303</guid>
		<description>I sometimes like David Brooks, and think that he can be very perceptive at times.  However, this column was a disaster, start to finish.  He spends most of it on the fresh idea of putting education at the top of a Republican president&#039;s agenda.  Wasn&#039;t Bush th Elder the &quot;education president&quot;, and didn&#039;t Bush the Younger give us NCLB as part of the centerpiece of his domestic program?   So the schools must be fixed by now, I would assume.  Then Brooks trots out the stale, horrible idea of &quot;National Service&quot;, as if giving that large a pool of labor would be used well by the government.    Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sometimes like David Brooks, and think that he can be very perceptive at times.  However, this column was a disaster, start to finish.  He spends most of it on the fresh idea of putting education at the top of a Republican president&#8217;s agenda.  Wasn&#8217;t Bush th Elder the &#8220;education president&#8221;, and didn&#8217;t Bush the Younger give us NCLB as part of the centerpiece of his domestic program?   So the schools must be fixed by now, I would assume.  Then Brooks trots out the stale, horrible idea of &#8220;National Service&#8221;, as if giving that large a pool of labor would be used well by the government.    Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wph</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12313</link>
		<dc:creator>wph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12313</guid>
		<description>I sometimes like David Brooks, and think that he can be very perceptive at times.  However, this column was a disaster, start to finish.  He spends most of it on the fresh idea of putting education at the top of a Republican president&#039;s agenda.  Wasn&#039;t Bush th Elder the &quot;education president&quot;, and didn&#039;t Bush the Younger give us NCLB as part of the centerpiece of his domestic program?   So the schools must be fixed by now, I would assume.  Then Brooks trots out the stale, horrible idea of &quot;National Service&quot;, as if giving that large a pool of labor would be used well by the government.    Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sometimes like David Brooks, and think that he can be very perceptive at times.  However, this column was a disaster, start to finish.  He spends most of it on the fresh idea of putting education at the top of a Republican president&#8217;s agenda.  Wasn&#8217;t Bush th Elder the &#8220;education president&#8221;, and didn&#8217;t Bush the Younger give us NCLB as part of the centerpiece of his domestic program?   So the schools must be fixed by now, I would assume.  Then Brooks trots out the stale, horrible idea of &#8220;National Service&#8221;, as if giving that large a pool of labor would be used well by the government.    Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12302</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12302</guid>
		<description>I have to say, I rather enjoyed the use of the term &quot;positive government&quot; in that statement. I guess since the Bush years have more or less defiled the term &quot;compassionate conservatism&quot; as a political slogan, this is what Brooks and his allies have fallen back on.

The fact that &quot;positive government&quot; is a term that was about equally likely to appear in a Paul Krugman or Frank Rich column should tell you just about all you need to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I rather enjoyed the use of the term &#8220;positive government&#8221; in that statement. I guess since the Bush years have more or less defiled the term &#8220;compassionate conservatism&#8221; as a political slogan, this is what Brooks and his allies have fallen back on.</p>
<p>The fact that &#8220;positive government&#8221; is a term that was about equally likely to appear in a Paul Krugman or Frank Rich column should tell you just about all you need to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12307</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/15/david-brooks-and-the-infrastructure-of-technocratic-control/#comment-12307</guid>
		<description>I have to say, I rather enjoyed the use of the term &quot;positive government&quot; in that statement. I guess since the Bush years have more or less defiled the term &quot;compassionate conservatism&quot; as a political slogan, this is what Brooks and his allies have fallen back on.

The fact that &quot;positive government&quot; is a term that was about equally likely to appear in a Paul Krugman or Frank Rich column should tell you just about all you need to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I rather enjoyed the use of the term &#8220;positive government&#8221; in that statement. I guess since the Bush years have more or less defiled the term &#8220;compassionate conservatism&#8221; as a political slogan, this is what Brooks and his allies have fallen back on.</p>
<p>The fact that &#8220;positive government&#8221; is a term that was about equally likely to appear in a Paul Krugman or Frank Rich column should tell you just about all you need to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

