<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Moral Claims of Non-Citizens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JSBolton</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11976</link>
		<dc:creator>JSBolton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11976</guid>
		<description>It ought to be asked, how can a prospective immigrant have rights here, just by starting to move this way?  Is there some good to the species to be gained by inventing an obligation of the net taxpayers of our citizenry, to extend protection through our  government, out to all who say they want it? How do we know that foreigners here have rights and not privileges only? More cooperation of whatever kind is always better? What about cooperation by foreigners in increasing aggression on the net taxpayers of our citizenry, is that part of the dynamic cooperation that generates increased utility as it increases? The intellectually honest and sincere would want to answer these questions, or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It ought to be asked, how can a prospective immigrant have rights here, just by starting to move this way?  Is there some good to the species to be gained by inventing an obligation of the net taxpayers of our citizenry, to extend protection through our  government, out to all who say they want it? How do we know that foreigners here have rights and not privileges only? More cooperation of whatever kind is always better? What about cooperation by foreigners in increasing aggression on the net taxpayers of our citizenry, is that part of the dynamic cooperation that generates increased utility as it increases? The intellectually honest and sincere would want to answer these questions, or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSBolton</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11977</link>
		<dc:creator>JSBolton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11977</guid>
		<description>It ought to be asked, how can a prospective immigrant have rights here, just by starting to move this way?  Is there some good to the species to be gained by inventing an obligation of the net taxpayers of our citizenry, to extend protection through our  government, out to all who say they want it? How do we know that foreigners here have rights and not privileges only? More cooperation of whatever kind is always better? What about cooperation by foreigners in increasing aggression on the net taxpayers of our citizenry, is that part of the dynamic cooperation that generates increased utility as it increases? The intellectually honest and sincere would want to answer these questions, or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It ought to be asked, how can a prospective immigrant have rights here, just by starting to move this way?  Is there some good to the species to be gained by inventing an obligation of the net taxpayers of our citizenry, to extend protection through our  government, out to all who say they want it? How do we know that foreigners here have rights and not privileges only? More cooperation of whatever kind is always better? What about cooperation by foreigners in increasing aggression on the net taxpayers of our citizenry, is that part of the dynamic cooperation that generates increased utility as it increases? The intellectually honest and sincere would want to answer these questions, or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micha Ghertner</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11975</link>
		<dc:creator>Micha Ghertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11975</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to get into citing examples of non-State enforcement mechanisms in this thread; I know you&#039;re well read enough and familiar with the arguments already. The question of stability of civil institutions in a statist world is a good and tough one, but again, far beyond the point I wanted to make here, and far off topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to get into citing examples of non-State enforcement mechanisms in this thread; I know you&#8217;re well read enough and familiar with the arguments already. The question of stability of civil institutions in a statist world is a good and tough one, but again, far beyond the point I wanted to make here, and far off topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micha Ghertner</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-12016</link>
		<dc:creator>Micha Ghertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-12016</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to get into citing examples of non-State enforcement mechanisms in this thread; I know you&#039;re well read enough and familiar with the arguments already. The question of stability of civil institutions in a statist world is a good and tough one, but again, far beyond the point I wanted to make here, and far off topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to get into citing examples of non-State enforcement mechanisms in this thread; I know you&#8217;re well read enough and familiar with the arguments already. The question of stability of civil institutions in a statist world is a good and tough one, but again, far beyond the point I wanted to make here, and far off topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGGP</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11974</link>
		<dc:creator>TGGP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11974</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;a state is not the only enforcement mechanism of rights.&lt;/i&gt;
What are some other ones and why do they matter if the State can just drive them out of business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>a state is not the only enforcement mechanism of rights.</i><br />
What are some other ones and why do they matter if the State can just drive them out of business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGGP</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-12015</link>
		<dc:creator>TGGP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-12015</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;a state is not the only enforcement mechanism of rights.&lt;/i&gt;
What are some other ones and why do they matter if the State can just drive them out of business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>a state is not the only enforcement mechanism of rights.</i><br />
What are some other ones and why do they matter if the State can just drive them out of business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micha Ghertner</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11973</link>
		<dc:creator>Micha Ghertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11973</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Micha, what rights-enforcement mechanism is capable of protecting me from the state?&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t recall ever claiming I knew of such a mechanism. The lack of such a mechanism, of course, isn&#039;t incompatible with my statement that a state is not the only enforcement mechanism of rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Micha, what rights-enforcement mechanism is capable of protecting me from the state?</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall ever claiming I knew of such a mechanism. The lack of such a mechanism, of course, isn&#8217;t incompatible with my statement that a state is not the only enforcement mechanism of rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micha Ghertner</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11999</link>
		<dc:creator>Micha Ghertner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11999</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Micha, what rights-enforcement mechanism is capable of protecting me from the state?&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t recall ever claiming I knew of such a mechanism. The lack of such a mechanism, of course, isn&#039;t incompatible with my statement that a state is not the only enforcement mechanism of rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Micha, what rights-enforcement mechanism is capable of protecting me from the state?</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall ever claiming I knew of such a mechanism. The lack of such a mechanism, of course, isn&#8217;t incompatible with my statement that a state is not the only enforcement mechanism of rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11972</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-11972</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You gave two hypothetical claims and said if morality/rights are meaningless they are equally valid, which is to say not valid at all.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what I said. What I did say was that if all moral/rights assertions are thought to be equally reasonable, that leads to a contradiction -- but of course that&#039;s only true if you think that any moral/rights assertions are reasonable at all. In your case, then, you can at least escape the contradiction. Whether you can escape harm from the state or anything/one else, being unable to claim protection or help, is another matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You gave two hypothetical claims and said if morality/rights are meaningless they are equally valid, which is to say not valid at all.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what I said. What I did say was that if all moral/rights assertions are thought to be equally reasonable, that leads to a contradiction &#8212; but of course that&#8217;s only true if you think that any moral/rights assertions are reasonable at all. In your case, then, you can at least escape the contradiction. Whether you can escape harm from the state or anything/one else, being unable to claim protection or help, is another matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-12014</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/02/09/the-moral-claims-of-non-citizens/#comment-12014</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You gave two hypothetical claims and said if morality/rights are meaningless they are equally valid, which is to say not valid at all.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what I said. What I did say was that if all moral/rights assertions are thought to be equally reasonable, that leads to a contradiction -- but of course that&#039;s only true if you think that any moral/rights assertions are reasonable at all. In your case, then, you can at least escape the contradiction. Whether you can escape harm from the state or anything/one else, being unable to claim protection or help, is another matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You gave two hypothetical claims and said if morality/rights are meaningless they are equally valid, which is to say not valid at all.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what I said. What I did say was that if all moral/rights assertions are thought to be equally reasonable, that leads to a contradiction &#8212; but of course that&#8217;s only true if you think that any moral/rights assertions are reasonable at all. In your case, then, you can at least escape the contradiction. Whether you can escape harm from the state or anything/one else, being unable to claim protection or help, is another matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

