Also, I don’t know anyone who has studied this formally, but its evident from the U.S. that growth hasn’t suffered while formal group membership (by Putnam’s reckoning) has declined.
Also, I don’t know anyone who has studied this formally, but its evident from the U.S. that growth hasn’t suffered while formal group membership (by Putnam’s reckoning) has declined.
Thanks, Will!
Thanks, Will!
Tyler Cowen has a nice article about Putnam on his faculty page.
Tyler Cowen has a nice article about Putnam on his faculty page.
There’s the social capital literature; start at this website (in particular this reading list and especially this paper). “Trust” does well in cross-country growth regressions, but Putnam’s measures of group membership don’t perform well.
Also, I don’t know anyone who has studied this formally, but its evident from the U.S. that growth hasn’t suffered while formal group membership (by Putnam’s reckoning) has declined.
There’s the social capital literature; start at this website (in particular this reading list and especially this paper). “Trust” does well in cross-country growth regressions, but Putnam’s measures of group membership don’t perform well.
Also, I don’t know anyone who has studied this formally, but its evident from the U.S. that growth hasn’t suffered while formal group membership (by Putnam’s reckoning) has declined.
Thanks, Will!
Thanks, Will!
Tyler Cowen has a nice article about Putnam on his faculty page.
Tyler Cowen has a nice article about Putnam on his faculty page.