<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Americans Breed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wholesale Korean Fashion</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9793</link>
		<dc:creator>Wholesale Korean Fashion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9793</guid>
		<description>Wonderful article, just added the site to my favorites. Thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful article, just added the site to my favorites. Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vancouver, Canada</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9792</link>
		<dc:creator>Vancouver, Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9792</guid>
		<description>Hi. A little late here but I have a question...
Why is it assumed that Americans are more optimistic by the Harris Poll (Nearly two-thirds (65%) of adults in the United States say they expect their lives will improve in the next five years)

Maybe the other countries are already happy/content and don&#039;t think it can get any better - whereas the American respondents are not currently happy and need to hope for a better future.

I am a happy Canadian and would answer the Harris poll as &#039;not expecting the future to improve&#039; because I can&#039;t see how my life could improve.

A lot of the explanations for why Americans have a higher birth rate also apply to Canada (more &#039;dirt&#039;, lots of immigration, descendants of immigrants) but Canadians have a low birth rate.  Exploring the differences between these two similar countries may help answer why Americans are so fertile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. A little late here but I have a question&#8230;<br />
Why is it assumed that Americans are more optimistic by the Harris Poll (Nearly two-thirds (65%) of adults in the United States say they expect their lives will improve in the next five years)</p>
<p>Maybe the other countries are already happy/content and don&#8217;t think it can get any better &#8211; whereas the American respondents are not currently happy and need to hope for a better future.</p>
<p>I am a happy Canadian and would answer the Harris poll as &#8216;not expecting the future to improve&#8217; because I can&#8217;t see how my life could improve.</p>
<p>A lot of the explanations for why Americans have a higher birth rate also apply to Canada (more &#8216;dirt&#8217;, lots of immigration, descendants of immigrants) but Canadians have a low birth rate.  Exploring the differences between these two similar countries may help answer why Americans are so fertile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vancouver, Canada</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9829</link>
		<dc:creator>Vancouver, Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9829</guid>
		<description>Hi. A little late here but I have a question...
Why is it assumed that Americans are more optimistic by the Harris Poll (Nearly two-thirds (65%) of adults in the United States say they expect their lives will improve in the next five years)

Maybe the other countries are already happy/content and don&#039;t think it can get any better - whereas the American respondents are not currently happy and need to hope for a better future.

I am a happy Canadian and would answer the Harris poll as &#039;not expecting the future to improve&#039; because I can&#039;t see how my life could improve.

A lot of the explanations for why Americans have a higher birth rate also apply to Canada (more &#039;dirt&#039;, lots of immigration, descendants of immigrants) but Canadians have a low birth rate.  Exploring the differences between these two similar countries may help answer why Americans are so fertile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. A little late here but I have a question&#8230;<br />
Why is it assumed that Americans are more optimistic by the Harris Poll (Nearly two-thirds (65%) of adults in the United States say they expect their lives will improve in the next five years)</p>
<p>Maybe the other countries are already happy/content and don&#8217;t think it can get any better &#8211; whereas the American respondents are not currently happy and need to hope for a better future.</p>
<p>I am a happy Canadian and would answer the Harris poll as &#8216;not expecting the future to improve&#8217; because I can&#8217;t see how my life could improve.</p>
<p>A lot of the explanations for why Americans have a higher birth rate also apply to Canada (more &#8216;dirt&#8217;, lots of immigration, descendants of immigrants) but Canadians have a low birth rate.  Exploring the differences between these two similar countries may help answer why Americans are so fertile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Points Of Note &#187; Why do Americans Breed?</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9791</link>
		<dc:creator>Points Of Note &#187; Why do Americans Breed?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 01:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9791</guid>
		<description>[...] A great post by Cato analyst Will Wilkinson.  Check it out here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A great post by Cato analyst Will Wilkinson.  Check it out here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: great_ape</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9790</link>
		<dc:creator>great_ape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 23:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9790</guid>
		<description>Is there readily available data concerning the gender distribution among new births across these countries? There have been some reports in the scientific literature suggesting that women who are feeling more optimistic are more likely to give birth to boys. (Boys require more resources both during pregnancy and after birth.) If I recall correctly, the effect was not dramatic, but it was statistically significant. A trend towards more boys in countries with higher birth rates would lend support to the the optimism hypothesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there readily available data concerning the gender distribution among new births across these countries? There have been some reports in the scientific literature suggesting that women who are feeling more optimistic are more likely to give birth to boys. (Boys require more resources both during pregnancy and after birth.) If I recall correctly, the effect was not dramatic, but it was statistically significant. A trend towards more boys in countries with higher birth rates would lend support to the the optimism hypothesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: great_ape</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9796</link>
		<dc:creator>great_ape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9796</guid>
		<description>Is there readily available data concerning the gender distribution among new births across these countries? There have been some reports in the scientific literature suggesting that women who are feeling more optimistic are more likely to give birth to boys. (Boys require more resources both during pregnancy and after birth.) If I recall correctly, the effect was not dramatic, but it was statistically significant. A trend towards more boys in countries with higher birth rates would lend support to the the optimism hypothesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there readily available data concerning the gender distribution among new births across these countries? There have been some reports in the scientific literature suggesting that women who are feeling more optimistic are more likely to give birth to boys. (Boys require more resources both during pregnancy and after birth.) If I recall correctly, the effect was not dramatic, but it was statistically significant. A trend towards more boys in countries with higher birth rates would lend support to the the optimism hypothesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why We Keep Having So Many Babies : Hear ItFrom.Us</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9789</link>
		<dc:creator>Why We Keep Having So Many Babies : Hear ItFrom.Us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9789</guid>
		<description>[...] Mangu-Ward at Reason has blogs about Wilkinson, who cites a Harris Poll.  Mangu-Ward says that Wilkinson claims that the Harris Poll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mangu-Ward at Reason has blogs about Wilkinson, who cites a Harris Poll.  Mangu-Ward says that Wilkinson claims that the Harris Poll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9788</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9788</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t conflate &quot;optimism&quot; with &quot;happiness&quot;. The Danes for instance are a very pessimistic but very happy bunch. I&#039;m extremely skeptical of any reasoning that boils down human nature in such simplistic terms.

There may be social trends at work that aren&#039;t happening simultaneously on either side of the Atlantic. For instance the explosion in pre marital sex we&#039;ve seen in the west didn&#039;t start everywhere at once. The same could be true for birth rates. Whatever factors that are at work in Europe might start revealing their hand in the USA in a decade or two (if ever).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t conflate &#8220;optimism&#8221; with &#8220;happiness&#8221;. The Danes for instance are a very pessimistic but very happy bunch. I&#8217;m extremely skeptical of any reasoning that boils down human nature in such simplistic terms.</p>
<p>There may be social trends at work that aren&#8217;t happening simultaneously on either side of the Atlantic. For instance the explosion in pre marital sex we&#8217;ve seen in the west didn&#8217;t start everywhere at once. The same could be true for birth rates. Whatever factors that are at work in Europe might start revealing their hand in the USA in a decade or two (if ever).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9795</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9795</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t conflate &quot;optimism&quot; with &quot;happiness&quot;. The Danes for instance are a very pessimistic but very happy bunch. I&#039;m extremely skeptical of any reasoning that boils down human nature in such simplistic terms.

There may be social trends at work that aren&#039;t happening simultaneously on either side of the Atlantic. For instance the explosion in pre marital sex we&#039;ve seen in the west didn&#039;t start everywhere at once. The same could be true for birth rates. Whatever factors that are at work in Europe might start revealing their hand in the USA in a decade or two (if ever).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t conflate &#8220;optimism&#8221; with &#8220;happiness&#8221;. The Danes for instance are a very pessimistic but very happy bunch. I&#8217;m extremely skeptical of any reasoning that boils down human nature in such simplistic terms.</p>
<p>There may be social trends at work that aren&#8217;t happening simultaneously on either side of the Atlantic. For instance the explosion in pre marital sex we&#8217;ve seen in the west didn&#8217;t start everywhere at once. The same could be true for birth rates. Whatever factors that are at work in Europe might start revealing their hand in the USA in a decade or two (if ever).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hello, Gorgeous! &#171; Lotus</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9787</link>
		<dc:creator>Hello, Gorgeous! &#171; Lotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 03:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9787</guid>
		<description>[...] don&#8217;t out-breed Europeans because of housing rates or optimism or religion or any of that stuff. We out-breed them because we have better dentists; we&#8217;re just too damn pretty to resist each [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] don&#8217;t out-breed Europeans because of housing rates or optimism or religion or any of that stuff. We out-breed them because we have better dentists; we&#8217;re just too damn pretty to resist each [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9786</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9786</guid>
		<description>There is a number of reasons why people have children, as listed above by others.  These reasons are more or less important, depending on the living conditions where one lives.  In the third world, children are important for their cheap labor and support in old age.  If you live in the first world, and the basics of life (food, shelter, and clothing) are easily obtained, you have children to give your life meaning and purpose, since you have found that money, sex, and possesions will not.

There is no one reason why the birth rates are higher here than in Europe, it is a combination of factors that make child rearing more favorable and attractive.  However, once you have attained what you want in life on a material level, which is easy to do in America, most find that they are still not content with life and will try to increase there relationships with other humans.  Children also give one a feeling that their time on this mortal coil was not a complete waste of time and that they are leaving behind a legacy that will live on after their death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a number of reasons why people have children, as listed above by others.  These reasons are more or less important, depending on the living conditions where one lives.  In the third world, children are important for their cheap labor and support in old age.  If you live in the first world, and the basics of life (food, shelter, and clothing) are easily obtained, you have children to give your life meaning and purpose, since you have found that money, sex, and possesions will not.</p>
<p>There is no one reason why the birth rates are higher here than in Europe, it is a combination of factors that make child rearing more favorable and attractive.  However, once you have attained what you want in life on a material level, which is easy to do in America, most find that they are still not content with life and will try to increase there relationships with other humans.  Children also give one a feeling that their time on this mortal coil was not a complete waste of time and that they are leaving behind a legacy that will live on after their death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9828</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9828</guid>
		<description>There is a number of reasons why people have children, as listed above by others.  These reasons are more or less important, depending on the living conditions where one lives.  In the third world, children are important for their cheap labor and support in old age.  If you live in the first world, and the basics of life (food, shelter, and clothing) are easily obtained, you have children to give your life meaning and purpose, since you have found that money, sex, and possesions will not.

There is no one reason why the birth rates are higher here than in Europe, it is a combination of factors that make child rearing more favorable and attractive.  However, once you have attained what you want in life on a material level, which is easy to do in America, most find that they are still not content with life and will try to increase there relationships with other humans.  Children also give one a feeling that their time on this mortal coil was not a complete waste of time and that they are leaving behind a legacy that will live on after their death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a number of reasons why people have children, as listed above by others.  These reasons are more or less important, depending on the living conditions where one lives.  In the third world, children are important for their cheap labor and support in old age.  If you live in the first world, and the basics of life (food, shelter, and clothing) are easily obtained, you have children to give your life meaning and purpose, since you have found that money, sex, and possesions will not.</p>
<p>There is no one reason why the birth rates are higher here than in Europe, it is a combination of factors that make child rearing more favorable and attractive.  However, once you have attained what you want in life on a material level, which is easy to do in America, most find that they are still not content with life and will try to increase there relationships with other humans.  Children also give one a feeling that their time on this mortal coil was not a complete waste of time and that they are leaving behind a legacy that will live on after their death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt9</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9785</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9785</guid>
		<description>I disagree with most of you here. I think American exceptionalism is due exclusively to affordable housing. I think explanations like &quot;religion&quot;, &quot;tradition&quot;, &quot;reverence for kids&quot; etc, etc, etc, are nothing but horse puckey. These are the kinds of words used by bad writers and poets.

Seattle is often cited these days as a &quot;blue-state&quot; place with a low birth rate, compared to Salt Lake City being a &quot;red-state&quot; place with a higher birth rate. Guess what guys? 25 years ago Seattle used to be a &quot;family&quot; town with a Salt Lake City like birth rate. Today, it is not. Why? Because housing is way more expensive compared to income than it was 25 years ago. 25 years ago, Seattle housing was comparable to Salt Lake City. Today, its like California.

I can cite example after example. California&#039;s Central valley (often called the Sam Juaquin Valley) has become expansive as well. What cost $200K now goes for $400K. The trend is not limited to major cities. Even Bend, Oregon (population 50K) has a median house price of $350K.

Of course, much of this is based on a speculative bubble and does not reflect the &quot;fundamental&quot; value of real estate. But does anyone here really expect real estate values to return to 1995-2000 price levels (If you do, I&#039;ve got a hot deal on a bridge for you)?

The muslims in Europe do not have their &quot;third world&quot; birth rates. They have birth rates slightly higher than current U.S., but are falling almost as fast as the white European levels. Indeed, even much of the third world no longer has &quot;third world&quot; like birth rates. Both Turkey and Iran are below replacement and Egypt is falling fast. India&#039;s at 2.85 kids per woman (the muslim rate is around 3) and is falling fast. Only sub-Saharan Africa has really high birth-rates and even these are starting to decline in some countries.

Back to the U.S. If housing prices continue their long term trend of rising faster than income, you can donuts to dollars that the U.S. will have European (and East Asian) birth rates within the next 20 years (I think within 10 years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with most of you here. I think American exceptionalism is due exclusively to affordable housing. I think explanations like &#8220;religion&#8221;, &#8220;tradition&#8221;, &#8220;reverence for kids&#8221; etc, etc, etc, are nothing but horse puckey. These are the kinds of words used by bad writers and poets.</p>
<p>Seattle is often cited these days as a &#8220;blue-state&#8221; place with a low birth rate, compared to Salt Lake City being a &#8220;red-state&#8221; place with a higher birth rate. Guess what guys? 25 years ago Seattle used to be a &#8220;family&#8221; town with a Salt Lake City like birth rate. Today, it is not. Why? Because housing is way more expensive compared to income than it was 25 years ago. 25 years ago, Seattle housing was comparable to Salt Lake City. Today, its like California.</p>
<p>I can cite example after example. California&#8217;s Central valley (often called the Sam Juaquin Valley) has become expansive as well. What cost $200K now goes for $400K. The trend is not limited to major cities. Even Bend, Oregon (population 50K) has a median house price of $350K.</p>
<p>Of course, much of this is based on a speculative bubble and does not reflect the &#8220;fundamental&#8221; value of real estate. But does anyone here really expect real estate values to return to 1995-2000 price levels (If you do, I&#8217;ve got a hot deal on a bridge for you)?</p>
<p>The muslims in Europe do not have their &#8220;third world&#8221; birth rates. They have birth rates slightly higher than current U.S., but are falling almost as fast as the white European levels. Indeed, even much of the third world no longer has &#8220;third world&#8221; like birth rates. Both Turkey and Iran are below replacement and Egypt is falling fast. India&#8217;s at 2.85 kids per woman (the muslim rate is around 3) and is falling fast. Only sub-Saharan Africa has really high birth-rates and even these are starting to decline in some countries.</p>
<p>Back to the U.S. If housing prices continue their long term trend of rising faster than income, you can donuts to dollars that the U.S. will have European (and East Asian) birth rates within the next 20 years (I think within 10 years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt9</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9797</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9797</guid>
		<description>I disagree with most of you here. I think American exceptionalism is due exclusively to affordable housing. I think explanations like &quot;religion&quot;, &quot;tradition&quot;, &quot;reverence for kids&quot; etc, etc, etc, are nothing but horse puckey. These are the kinds of words used by bad writers and poets.

Seattle is often cited these days as a &quot;blue-state&quot; place with a low birth rate, compared to Salt Lake City being a &quot;red-state&quot; place with a higher birth rate. Guess what guys? 25 years ago Seattle used to be a &quot;family&quot; town with a Salt Lake City like birth rate. Today, it is not. Why? Because housing is way more expensive compared to income than it was 25 years ago. 25 years ago, Seattle housing was comparable to Salt Lake City. Today, its like California.

I can cite example after example. California&#039;s Central valley (often called the Sam Juaquin Valley) has become expansive as well. What cost $200K now goes for $400K. The trend is not limited to major cities. Even Bend, Oregon (population 50K) has a median house price of $350K.

Of course, much of this is based on a speculative bubble and does not reflect the &quot;fundamental&quot; value of real estate. But does anyone here really expect real estate values to return to 1995-2000 price levels (If you do, I&#039;ve got a hot deal on a bridge for you)?

The muslims in Europe do not have their &quot;third world&quot; birth rates. They have birth rates slightly higher than current U.S., but are falling almost as fast as the white European levels. Indeed, even much of the third world no longer has &quot;third world&quot; like birth rates. Both Turkey and Iran are below replacement and Egypt is falling fast. India&#039;s at 2.85 kids per woman (the muslim rate is around 3) and is falling fast. Only sub-Saharan Africa has really high birth-rates and even these are starting to decline in some countries.

Back to the U.S. If housing prices continue their long term trend of rising faster than income, you can donuts to dollars that the U.S. will have European (and East Asian) birth rates within the next 20 years (I think within 10 years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with most of you here. I think American exceptionalism is due exclusively to affordable housing. I think explanations like &#8220;religion&#8221;, &#8220;tradition&#8221;, &#8220;reverence for kids&#8221; etc, etc, etc, are nothing but horse puckey. These are the kinds of words used by bad writers and poets.</p>
<p>Seattle is often cited these days as a &#8220;blue-state&#8221; place with a low birth rate, compared to Salt Lake City being a &#8220;red-state&#8221; place with a higher birth rate. Guess what guys? 25 years ago Seattle used to be a &#8220;family&#8221; town with a Salt Lake City like birth rate. Today, it is not. Why? Because housing is way more expensive compared to income than it was 25 years ago. 25 years ago, Seattle housing was comparable to Salt Lake City. Today, its like California.</p>
<p>I can cite example after example. California&#8217;s Central valley (often called the Sam Juaquin Valley) has become expansive as well. What cost $200K now goes for $400K. The trend is not limited to major cities. Even Bend, Oregon (population 50K) has a median house price of $350K.</p>
<p>Of course, much of this is based on a speculative bubble and does not reflect the &#8220;fundamental&#8221; value of real estate. But does anyone here really expect real estate values to return to 1995-2000 price levels (If you do, I&#8217;ve got a hot deal on a bridge for you)?</p>
<p>The muslims in Europe do not have their &#8220;third world&#8221; birth rates. They have birth rates slightly higher than current U.S., but are falling almost as fast as the white European levels. Indeed, even much of the third world no longer has &#8220;third world&#8221; like birth rates. Both Turkey and Iran are below replacement and Egypt is falling fast. India&#8217;s at 2.85 kids per woman (the muslim rate is around 3) and is falling fast. Only sub-Saharan Africa has really high birth-rates and even these are starting to decline in some countries.</p>
<p>Back to the U.S. If housing prices continue their long term trend of rising faster than income, you can donuts to dollars that the U.S. will have European (and East Asian) birth rates within the next 20 years (I think within 10 years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lehosh</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9784</link>
		<dc:creator>Lehosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/04/27/why-americans-breed/#comment-9784</guid>
		<description>The &quot;affordable housing&quot; and &quot;dirt gap&quot; theories don&#039;t necessarily hold water either. If, as Ed said, this was the &quot;obvious answer&quot;, then African and Arab minorities in Europe would not still have their 3rd world fertility rates and no one would be talking about immigrants &quot;breeding out&quot; native Europeans. Arab women in Europe have a higher fertility than almost any white community in the US (besides Mormons in Utah), and the French banlieu is not nearly as spacious or as cheap as a cottage in Kansas.

One factor people are overlooking I think is the acceptability of motherhood in the United States. Motherhood as a calling has withstood the onslaught of &quot;modernism&quot; in America in a way that it did not in Western Europe. America has a nostalgia for its roots and I think we underestimate how many people, young women especially, still hope for and work toward the nuclear family ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;affordable housing&#8221; and &#8220;dirt gap&#8221; theories don&#8217;t necessarily hold water either. If, as Ed said, this was the &#8220;obvious answer&#8221;, then African and Arab minorities in Europe would not still have their 3rd world fertility rates and no one would be talking about immigrants &#8220;breeding out&#8221; native Europeans. Arab women in Europe have a higher fertility than almost any white community in the US (besides Mormons in Utah), and the French banlieu is not nearly as spacious or as cheap as a cottage in Kansas.</p>
<p>One factor people are overlooking I think is the acceptability of motherhood in the United States. Motherhood as a calling has withstood the onslaught of &#8220;modernism&#8221; in America in a way that it did not in Western Europe. America has a nostalgia for its roots and I think we underestimate how many people, young women especially, still hope for and work toward the nuclear family ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

