<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans are Happier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rush suffering from Chest Pains; In serious condition - Politics and Other Controversies - Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Third Parties, Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Congress, President - Page 10 - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7601</link>
		<dc:creator>Rush suffering from Chest Pains; In serious condition - Politics and Other Controversies - Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Third Parties, Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Congress, President - Page 10 - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7601</guid>
		<description>[...] are pi$$ed off people. You know that&#039;s true.    Science says your wrong Lighten up Frances...  Republicans are Happier  Conservatives Happier Than Liberals &#124; LiveScience   LIBERALS ARE MISERABLE CREATURES STUDY SHOWS - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are pi$$ed off people. You know that&#8217;s true.    Science says your wrong Lighten up Frances&#8230;  Republicans are Happier  Conservatives Happier Than Liberals | LiveScience   LIBERALS ARE MISERABLE CREATURES STUDY SHOWS &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Level I Inventory Control</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7600</link>
		<dc:creator>Level I Inventory Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7600</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Control Your Own Level of Motivation...&lt;/strong&gt;

When I first mention this to most people, they really don&#039;t get it, so here is a simple formula for keeping your moods upbeat....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Control Your Own Level of Motivation&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>When I first mention this to most people, they really don&#8217;t get it, so here is a simple formula for keeping your moods upbeat&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7599</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7599</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to go with blissful ignorance being the key factor. I know whereof I speak since I was raised in a conservative, but not rich or even middle class, family. I voted Republican for years as an adult even though it always seemed like the Democrats were actually the ones who were more interested in helping people instead of lining their own pockets and wearing their religion on their their sleeves but not in their hearts.

You see, I used to believe what I had been taught about Republicans being tough and not backing down in international affairs and that the Democrats were cowardly. Imagine my shock when I finally found out that most of the high-ranking Repubs and their talking heads (e.g. Limbaugh, Hannity, O&#039;Reilly, Beck, Savage, etc...) never served in the military and many of the Dems that they considered cowardly actually had served. It was also a big shock to find out that most of said talking heads were early college drop-outs who had no idea what the hell they were talking about on AM radio and in their books. I was a bit surprised also to find out that the &quot;evil&quot; Democrats weren&#039;t godless, quite a few were actually religious, they just don&#039;t play that card.

I was a lot happier back then when I had blind faith in the Republicans. That all changed the moment I took my head out of the send (or wherever else I had it buried  for all of those years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to go with blissful ignorance being the key factor. I know whereof I speak since I was raised in a conservative, but not rich or even middle class, family. I voted Republican for years as an adult even though it always seemed like the Democrats were actually the ones who were more interested in helping people instead of lining their own pockets and wearing their religion on their their sleeves but not in their hearts.</p>
<p>You see, I used to believe what I had been taught about Republicans being tough and not backing down in international affairs and that the Democrats were cowardly. Imagine my shock when I finally found out that most of the high-ranking Repubs and their talking heads (e.g. Limbaugh, Hannity, O&#8217;Reilly, Beck, Savage, etc&#8230;) never served in the military and many of the Dems that they considered cowardly actually had served. It was also a big shock to find out that most of said talking heads were early college drop-outs who had no idea what the hell they were talking about on AM radio and in their books. I was a bit surprised also to find out that the &#8220;evil&#8221; Democrats weren&#8217;t godless, quite a few were actually religious, they just don&#8217;t play that card.</p>
<p>I was a lot happier back then when I had blind faith in the Republicans. That all changed the moment I took my head out of the send (or wherever else I had it buried  for all of those years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7623</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7623</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to go with blissful ignorance being the key factor. I know whereof I speak since I was raised in a conservative, but not rich or even middle class, family. I voted Republican for years as an adult even though it always seemed like the Democrats were actually the ones who were more interested in helping people instead of lining their own pockets and wearing their religion on their their sleeves but not in their hearts.

You see, I used to believe what I had been taught about Republicans being tough and not backing down in international affairs and that the Democrats were cowardly. Imagine my shock when I finally found out that most of the high-ranking Repubs and their talking heads (e.g. Limbaugh, Hannity, O&#039;Reilly, Beck, Savage, etc...) never served in the military and many of the Dems that they considered cowardly actually had served. It was also a big shock to find out that most of said talking heads were early college drop-outs who had no idea what the hell they were talking about on AM radio and in their books. I was a bit surprised also to find out that the &quot;evil&quot; Democrats weren&#039;t godless, quite a few were actually religious, they just don&#039;t play that card.

I was a lot happier back then when I had blind faith in the Republicans. That all changed the moment I took my head out of the send (or wherever else I had it buried  for all of those years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to go with blissful ignorance being the key factor. I know whereof I speak since I was raised in a conservative, but not rich or even middle class, family. I voted Republican for years as an adult even though it always seemed like the Democrats were actually the ones who were more interested in helping people instead of lining their own pockets and wearing their religion on their their sleeves but not in their hearts.</p>
<p>You see, I used to believe what I had been taught about Republicans being tough and not backing down in international affairs and that the Democrats were cowardly. Imagine my shock when I finally found out that most of the high-ranking Repubs and their talking heads (e.g. Limbaugh, Hannity, O&#8217;Reilly, Beck, Savage, etc&#8230;) never served in the military and many of the Dems that they considered cowardly actually had served. It was also a big shock to find out that most of said talking heads were early college drop-outs who had no idea what the hell they were talking about on AM radio and in their books. I was a bit surprised also to find out that the &#8220;evil&#8221; Democrats weren&#8217;t godless, quite a few were actually religious, they just don&#8217;t play that card.</p>
<p>I was a lot happier back then when I had blind faith in the Republicans. That all changed the moment I took my head out of the send (or wherever else I had it buried  for all of those years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thacker</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7598</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7598</guid>
		<description>Democrats are more likely than Republicans, overall, to believe in class warfare, and to believe that the rich get their wealth at the expense of the poor.  This can cause resentment in the lower class and guilt in the upper.  Perhaps Democrats are somewhat more likely to judge their happiness based on what others have.

Interesting that it seems to happen even when one corrects for ideology, though I wonder exactly the methodology.

&lt;em&gt;But if you believed that such unfairness can be redressed through human effort, why would you be unhappy?&lt;/em&gt;

Because the unfairness is still there, and that must be someone&#039;s fault, perhaps even the fault of a shadowy evil conspiracy.  There are exceptions, certainly, &quot;Happy Warriors&quot; like Hubert Humphrey, and dour pessimists, but it seems like in generall the idea that any blemish is the result of preventable human fault or mistake rather than the natural, expected state of a fallen imperfect world tends to make people less happy.

&lt;em&gt;Republicans report greater satisfaction with their sex lives, too. Why? The most likely explanation is that Republicans skew male, and men are more likely to say they enjoy their sex lives.&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;ve seen several surveys showing that Republican &lt;em&gt;women&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats are more likely than Republicans, overall, to believe in class warfare, and to believe that the rich get their wealth at the expense of the poor.  This can cause resentment in the lower class and guilt in the upper.  Perhaps Democrats are somewhat more likely to judge their happiness based on what others have.</p>
<p>Interesting that it seems to happen even when one corrects for ideology, though I wonder exactly the methodology.</p>
<p><em>But if you believed that such unfairness can be redressed through human effort, why would you be unhappy?</em></p>
<p>Because the unfairness is still there, and that must be someone&#8217;s fault, perhaps even the fault of a shadowy evil conspiracy.  There are exceptions, certainly, &#8220;Happy Warriors&#8221; like Hubert Humphrey, and dour pessimists, but it seems like in generall the idea that any blemish is the result of preventable human fault or mistake rather than the natural, expected state of a fallen imperfect world tends to make people less happy.</p>
<p><em>Republicans report greater satisfaction with their sex lives, too. Why? The most likely explanation is that Republicans skew male, and men are more likely to say they enjoy their sex lives.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen several surveys showing that Republican <em>women</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thacker</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7622</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7622</guid>
		<description>Democrats are more likely than Republicans, overall, to believe in class warfare, and to believe that the rich get their wealth at the expense of the poor.  This can cause resentment in the lower class and guilt in the upper.  Perhaps Democrats are somewhat more likely to judge their happiness based on what others have.

Interesting that it seems to happen even when one corrects for ideology, though I wonder exactly the methodology.

&lt;em&gt;But if you believed that such unfairness can be redressed through human effort, why would you be unhappy?&lt;/em&gt;

Because the unfairness is still there, and that must be someone&#039;s fault, perhaps even the fault of a shadowy evil conspiracy.  There are exceptions, certainly, &quot;Happy Warriors&quot; like Hubert Humphrey, and dour pessimists, but it seems like in generall the idea that any blemish is the result of preventable human fault or mistake rather than the natural, expected state of a fallen imperfect world tends to make people less happy.

&lt;em&gt;Republicans report greater satisfaction with their sex lives, too. Why? The most likely explanation is that Republicans skew male, and men are more likely to say they enjoy their sex lives.&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;ve seen several surveys showing that Republican &lt;em&gt;women&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats are more likely than Republicans, overall, to believe in class warfare, and to believe that the rich get their wealth at the expense of the poor.  This can cause resentment in the lower class and guilt in the upper.  Perhaps Democrats are somewhat more likely to judge their happiness based on what others have.</p>
<p>Interesting that it seems to happen even when one corrects for ideology, though I wonder exactly the methodology.</p>
<p><em>But if you believed that such unfairness can be redressed through human effort, why would you be unhappy?</em></p>
<p>Because the unfairness is still there, and that must be someone&#8217;s fault, perhaps even the fault of a shadowy evil conspiracy.  There are exceptions, certainly, &#8220;Happy Warriors&#8221; like Hubert Humphrey, and dour pessimists, but it seems like in generall the idea that any blemish is the result of preventable human fault or mistake rather than the natural, expected state of a fallen imperfect world tends to make people less happy.</p>
<p><em>Republicans report greater satisfaction with their sex lives, too. Why? The most likely explanation is that Republicans skew male, and men are more likely to say they enjoy their sex lives.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen several surveys showing that Republican <em>women</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7597</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7597</guid>
		<description>Chris, thanks for the correction. So, can we agree that, in answer to Will&#039;s question at the end of his post, and using the study you cited, the one general psychological trait that would predict both higher self-reported happiness &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; &quot;Republicanism&quot; is just absence of &quot;neuroticism&quot;?

Re: the bias among academics study -- I&#039;d like to have the authors&#039; side of the story before coming to my own conclusions regarding your allegations. But, be that as it may, my point wasn&#039;t personal -- it related to the more general point that ideology so permeates the social &quot;sciences&quot; in general (the reason for the scare quotes) that studies or &quot;findings&quot; which flatter their political predilections deserve, and usually receive, special skepticism, among all but the most biased or credulous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thanks for the correction. So, can we agree that, in answer to Will&#8217;s question at the end of his post, and using the study you cited, the one general psychological trait that would predict both higher self-reported happiness <i>and</i> &#8220;Republicanism&#8221; is just absence of &#8220;neuroticism&#8221;?</p>
<p>Re: the bias among academics study &#8212; I&#8217;d like to have the authors&#8217; side of the story before coming to my own conclusions regarding your allegations. But, be that as it may, my point wasn&#8217;t personal &#8212; it related to the more general point that ideology so permeates the social &#8220;sciences&#8221; in general (the reason for the scare quotes) that studies or &#8220;findings&#8221; which flatter their political predilections deserve, and usually receive, special skepticism, among all but the most biased or credulous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7621</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7621</guid>
		<description>Chris, thanks for the correction. So, can we agree that, in answer to Will&#039;s question at the end of his post, and using the study you cited, the one general psychological trait that would predict both higher self-reported happiness &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; &quot;Republicanism&quot; is just absence of &quot;neuroticism&quot;?

Re: the bias among academics study -- I&#039;d like to have the authors&#039; side of the story before coming to my own conclusions regarding your allegations. But, be that as it may, my point wasn&#039;t personal -- it related to the more general point that ideology so permeates the social &quot;sciences&quot; in general (the reason for the scare quotes) that studies or &quot;findings&quot; which flatter their political predilections deserve, and usually receive, special skepticism, among all but the most biased or credulous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thanks for the correction. So, can we agree that, in answer to Will&#8217;s question at the end of his post, and using the study you cited, the one general psychological trait that would predict both higher self-reported happiness <i>and</i> &#8220;Republicanism&#8221; is just absence of &#8220;neuroticism&#8221;?</p>
<p>Re: the bias among academics study &#8212; I&#8217;d like to have the authors&#8217; side of the story before coming to my own conclusions regarding your allegations. But, be that as it may, my point wasn&#8217;t personal &#8212; it related to the more general point that ideology so permeates the social &#8220;sciences&#8221; in general (the reason for the scare quotes) that studies or &#8220;findings&#8221; which flatter their political predilections deserve, and usually receive, special skepticism, among all but the most biased or credulous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7596</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7596</guid>
		<description>Larry, first: my ideological stance has nothing to do with the fact that, as has been well documented (including in subsequent issues of Forum), there are clear methodological problems with that study, which make it difficult, if not impossible, to explain the disparity with their data. It&#039;s also not a fact, which has nothing to do with my ideology, that they refuse to give out their data, which should make anyone think twice before citing a study for which they gave a very bare-bones description.

Second, you&#039;re right about the study you cited. In my notes, I had all of those correlations as positive. My notes were clearly wrong. Sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, first: my ideological stance has nothing to do with the fact that, as has been well documented (including in subsequent issues of Forum), there are clear methodological problems with that study, which make it difficult, if not impossible, to explain the disparity with their data. It&#8217;s also not a fact, which has nothing to do with my ideology, that they refuse to give out their data, which should make anyone think twice before citing a study for which they gave a very bare-bones description.</p>
<p>Second, you&#8217;re right about the study you cited. In my notes, I had all of those correlations as positive. My notes were clearly wrong. Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7620</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/02/14/republicans-are-happier/#comment-7620</guid>
		<description>Larry, first: my ideological stance has nothing to do with the fact that, as has been well documented (including in subsequent issues of Forum), there are clear methodological problems with that study, which make it difficult, if not impossible, to explain the disparity with their data. It&#039;s also not a fact, which has nothing to do with my ideology, that they refuse to give out their data, which should make anyone think twice before citing a study for which they gave a very bare-bones description.

Second, you&#039;re right about the study you cited. In my notes, I had all of those correlations as positive. My notes were clearly wrong. Sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, first: my ideological stance has nothing to do with the fact that, as has been well documented (including in subsequent issues of Forum), there are clear methodological problems with that study, which make it difficult, if not impossible, to explain the disparity with their data. It&#8217;s also not a fact, which has nothing to do with my ideology, that they refuse to give out their data, which should make anyone think twice before citing a study for which they gave a very bare-bones description.</p>
<p>Second, you&#8217;re right about the study you cited. In my notes, I had all of those correlations as positive. My notes were clearly wrong. Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

