<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Strange Myth of Finite Status</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dig a Phony: Identity, Consumerism and the &#8220;Jelly-Jar Problem&#8221; &#171; Generation Bubble</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7240</link>
		<dc:creator>Dig a Phony: Identity, Consumerism and the &#8220;Jelly-Jar Problem&#8221; &#171; Generation Bubble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7240</guid>
		<description>[...] a post from a few years ago, Will Wilkinson, a research fellow at the libertarian think tank The Cato [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post from a few years ago, Will Wilkinson, a research fellow at the libertarian think tank The Cato [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asd</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7239</link>
		<dc:creator>asd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7239</guid>
		<description>http://gooooooooogler.de
r</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gooooooooogler.de" rel="nofollow">http://gooooooooogler.de</a><br />
r</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asd</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7246</link>
		<dc:creator>asd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7246</guid>
		<description>http://gooooooooogler.de
r</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gooooooooogler.de" rel="nofollow">http://gooooooooogler.de</a><br />
r</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Einzige</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7238</link>
		<dc:creator>Einzige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7238</guid>
		<description>Your post is very interesting, and it reminds me of a movie I saw once in my health class in high school, showing a number of binary chicken interactions. Our assignment was to keep track of the outcomes and then list the pecking order.

What the chicken study (and my own direct experience with chickens and people) suggests to me is that the most important aspect of &quot;status&quot; is the self-belief. Outside of the position-revealing behavior itself, there was nothing externally obvious about any of the chickens that made you think, &quot;Oh, yes, THAT&#039;s the top chicken.&quot; So, it must be something inherent in the chicken&#039;s thought process, and, by extension, in our own.

Put the Mayor and the Quarterback and the Philosopher and the Mafia Don and the Chief Justice and the Garbage Man in a room together, and *someone* will percolate to the top of the pecking order. You and I might think that the quarterback and the philosopher are the greatest guys in the world, but perhaps they&#039;ve got some self-esteem issues that, in the position-jockie, end up taking them out of the running early.

I guess this is not so much a criticism of your point, but more of an additional aspect, for what it&#039;s worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post is very interesting, and it reminds me of a movie I saw once in my health class in high school, showing a number of binary chicken interactions. Our assignment was to keep track of the outcomes and then list the pecking order.</p>
<p>What the chicken study (and my own direct experience with chickens and people) suggests to me is that the most important aspect of &#8220;status&#8221; is the self-belief. Outside of the position-revealing behavior itself, there was nothing externally obvious about any of the chickens that made you think, &#8220;Oh, yes, THAT&#8217;s the top chicken.&#8221; So, it must be something inherent in the chicken&#8217;s thought process, and, by extension, in our own.</p>
<p>Put the Mayor and the Quarterback and the Philosopher and the Mafia Don and the Chief Justice and the Garbage Man in a room together, and *someone* will percolate to the top of the pecking order. You and I might think that the quarterback and the philosopher are the greatest guys in the world, but perhaps they&#8217;ve got some self-esteem issues that, in the position-jockie, end up taking them out of the running early.</p>
<p>I guess this is not so much a criticism of your point, but more of an additional aspect, for what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Einzige</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7245</link>
		<dc:creator>Einzige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7245</guid>
		<description>Your post is very interesting, and it reminds me of a movie I saw once in my health class in high school, showing a number of binary chicken interactions. Our assignment was to keep track of the outcomes and then list the pecking order.

What the chicken study (and my own direct experience with chickens and people) suggests to me is that the most important aspect of &quot;status&quot; is the self-belief. Outside of the position-revealing behavior itself, there was nothing externally obvious about any of the chickens that made you think, &quot;Oh, yes, THAT&#039;s the top chicken.&quot; So, it must be something inherent in the chicken&#039;s thought process, and, by extension, in our own.

Put the Mayor and the Quarterback and the Philosopher and the Mafia Don and the Chief Justice and the Garbage Man in a room together, and *someone* will percolate to the top of the pecking order. You and I might think that the quarterback and the philosopher are the greatest guys in the world, but perhaps they&#039;ve got some self-esteem issues that, in the position-jockie, end up taking them out of the running early.

I guess this is not so much a criticism of your point, but more of an additional aspect, for what it&#039;s worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post is very interesting, and it reminds me of a movie I saw once in my health class in high school, showing a number of binary chicken interactions. Our assignment was to keep track of the outcomes and then list the pecking order.</p>
<p>What the chicken study (and my own direct experience with chickens and people) suggests to me is that the most important aspect of &#8220;status&#8221; is the self-belief. Outside of the position-revealing behavior itself, there was nothing externally obvious about any of the chickens that made you think, &#8220;Oh, yes, THAT&#8217;s the top chicken.&#8221; So, it must be something inherent in the chicken&#8217;s thought process, and, by extension, in our own.</p>
<p>Put the Mayor and the Quarterback and the Philosopher and the Mafia Don and the Chief Justice and the Garbage Man in a room together, and *someone* will percolate to the top of the pecking order. You and I might think that the quarterback and the philosopher are the greatest guys in the world, but perhaps they&#8217;ve got some self-esteem issues that, in the position-jockie, end up taking them out of the running early.</p>
<p>I guess this is not so much a criticism of your point, but more of an additional aspect, for what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafal Smigrodzki</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7237</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafal Smigrodzki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7237</guid>
		<description>I posted the comments below to a transhumanist list I like:

Just think about it. It is not wrong at all to engage in positional games. Pissing contests are not the reviled zero-sum games that e.g. Nick Bostrom would like to ban.

Let thousands of unequal flowers bloom, each higher than all others, in one of the world&#039;s infinite dimensions. Burn the atavistic neurons of envy out of your brains, fellow transhumanists. Become better persons by being better, not equal.

Let the New Revolution begin:

Liberte-Inegalite-Atomisation!

Rafal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted the comments below to a transhumanist list I like:</p>
<p>Just think about it. It is not wrong at all to engage in positional games. Pissing contests are not the reviled zero-sum games that e.g. Nick Bostrom would like to ban.</p>
<p>Let thousands of unequal flowers bloom, each higher than all others, in one of the world&#8217;s infinite dimensions. Burn the atavistic neurons of envy out of your brains, fellow transhumanists. Become better persons by being better, not equal.</p>
<p>Let the New Revolution begin:</p>
<p>Liberte-Inegalite-Atomisation!</p>
<p>Rafal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafal Smigrodzki</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7244</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafal Smigrodzki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7244</guid>
		<description>I posted the comments below to a transhumanist list I like:

Just think about it. It is not wrong at all to engage in positional games. Pissing contests are not the reviled zero-sum games that e.g. Nick Bostrom would like to ban.

Let thousands of unequal flowers bloom, each higher than all others, in one of the world&#039;s infinite dimensions. Burn the atavistic neurons of envy out of your brains, fellow transhumanists. Become better persons by being better, not equal.

Let the New Revolution begin:

Liberte-Inegalite-Atomisation!

Rafal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted the comments below to a transhumanist list I like:</p>
<p>Just think about it. It is not wrong at all to engage in positional games. Pissing contests are not the reviled zero-sum games that e.g. Nick Bostrom would like to ban.</p>
<p>Let thousands of unequal flowers bloom, each higher than all others, in one of the world&#8217;s infinite dimensions. Burn the atavistic neurons of envy out of your brains, fellow transhumanists. Become better persons by being better, not equal.</p>
<p>Let the New Revolution begin:</p>
<p>Liberte-Inegalite-Atomisation!</p>
<p>Rafal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salivating Dog</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7236</link>
		<dc:creator>Salivating Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7236</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Status, etc.&lt;/strong&gt;

The Strange Myth of Finite Status This is the most interesting thing you&#039;ll read all day, although he lapses into economics talk, so here&#039;s a quick primer. If you already know this stuff, just read the thing! When he refers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Status, etc.</strong></p>
<p>The Strange Myth of Finite Status This is the most interesting thing you&#8217;ll read all day, although he lapses into economics talk, so here&#8217;s a quick primer. If you already know this stuff, just read the thing! When he refers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austen</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7235</link>
		<dc:creator>Austen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 13:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7235</guid>
		<description>&quot;What we do is encourage a decentralized entrepreneurial culture where status domains without number may bloom.&quot;

Amen. I dig this post. Seems there&#039;s a backdoor pro- decentralized culture point here too: viz. more status domains means some folks are understanding and evaluating one another by employing more and richer categories. Which means: more social pressure toward mental alertness and agility, since which categories to apply in which context is a trickier matter (than it is, say, under a dictatorship where the status ponds are fewer, less diverse, more dictated). Which means a marginally cleverer, more mindful populace. Or something like that. Point is, hurrah! for being able to win at life in lotsa different ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What we do is encourage a decentralized entrepreneurial culture where status domains without number may bloom.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen. I dig this post. Seems there&#8217;s a backdoor pro- decentralized culture point here too: viz. more status domains means some folks are understanding and evaluating one another by employing more and richer categories. Which means: more social pressure toward mental alertness and agility, since which categories to apply in which context is a trickier matter (than it is, say, under a dictatorship where the status ponds are fewer, less diverse, more dictated). Which means a marginally cleverer, more mindful populace. Or something like that. Point is, hurrah! for being able to win at life in lotsa different ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austen</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/01/02/the-strange-myth-of-finite-status/#comment-7243</link>
		<dc:creator>Austen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=868#comment-7243</guid>
		<description>&quot;What we do is encourage a decentralized entrepreneurial culture where status domains without number may bloom.&quot;

Amen. I dig this post. Seems there&#039;s a backdoor pro- decentralized culture point here too: viz. more status domains means some folks are understanding and evaluating one another by employing more and richer categories. Which means: more social pressure toward mental alertness and agility, since which categories to apply in which context is a trickier matter (than it is, say, under a dictatorship where the status ponds are fewer, less diverse, more dictated). Which means a marginally cleverer, more mindful populace. Or something like that. Point is, hurrah! for being able to win at life in lotsa different ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What we do is encourage a decentralized entrepreneurial culture where status domains without number may bloom.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen. I dig this post. Seems there&#8217;s a backdoor pro- decentralized culture point here too: viz. more status domains means some folks are understanding and evaluating one another by employing more and richer categories. Which means: more social pressure toward mental alertness and agility, since which categories to apply in which context is a trickier matter (than it is, say, under a dictatorship where the status ponds are fewer, less diverse, more dictated). Which means a marginally cleverer, more mindful populace. Or something like that. Point is, hurrah! for being able to win at life in lotsa different ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

