<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Flat Trend in Self-reported Happiness a Problem?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sesso</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/#comment-7229</link>
		<dc:creator>sesso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=866#comment-7229</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;sesso...&lt;/strong&gt;

news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>sesso&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biopolitical</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/#comment-7228</link>
		<dc:creator>Biopolitical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=866#comment-7228</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Happy New Year&lt;/strong&gt;

I wish people enjoy more freedom to trade, move and create wealth next year. Be happy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Happy New Year</strong></p>
<p>I wish people enjoy more freedom to trade, move and create wealth next year. Be happy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farsam</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/#comment-7227</link>
		<dc:creator>Farsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=866#comment-7227</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/psych_model/psych_model1.cfm/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Many people in these societies are at or near their hedonic limits. (Note: I think it may be possible for some people to push the limits through the right combination of diet, exercise, meditation, counseling, adventure, simplification, etc. But there are many others for whom this kind of stuff is pretty much impossible without fundamentally altering the kind of person they are. And I think most people, once they hit a certain threshold, are happy enough that they could just care less about further maximizing the positive qualitative character of their background affect. Dharma just wasn’t that much better off than Greg, once he loosened up a little.)&quot;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/psych_model/psych_model1.cfm/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Many people in these societies are at or near their hedonic limits. (Note: I think it may be possible for some people to push the limits through the right combination of diet, exercise, meditation, counseling, adventure, simplification, etc. But there are many others for whom this kind of stuff is pretty much impossible without fundamentally altering the kind of person they are. And I think most people, once they hit a certain threshold, are happy enough that they could just care less about further maximizing the positive qualitative character of their background affect. Dharma just wasn’t that much better off than Greg, once he loosened up a little.)&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farsam</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/#comment-7232</link>
		<dc:creator>Farsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=866#comment-7232</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/psych_model/psych_model1.cfm/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Many people in these societies are at or near their hedonic limits. (Note: I think it may be possible for some people to push the limits through the right combination of diet, exercise, meditation, counseling, adventure, simplification, etc. But there are many others for whom this kind of stuff is pretty much impossible without fundamentally altering the kind of person they are. And I think most people, once they hit a certain threshold, are happy enough that they could just care less about further maximizing the positive qualitative character of their background affect. Dharma just wasn’t that much better off than Greg, once he loosened up a little.)&quot;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/psych_model/psych_model1.cfm/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Many people in these societies are at or near their hedonic limits. (Note: I think it may be possible for some people to push the limits through the right combination of diet, exercise, meditation, counseling, adventure, simplification, etc. But there are many others for whom this kind of stuff is pretty much impossible without fundamentally altering the kind of person they are. And I think most people, once they hit a certain threshold, are happy enough that they could just care less about further maximizing the positive qualitative character of their background affect. Dharma just wasn’t that much better off than Greg, once he loosened up a little.)&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/#comment-7226</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=866#comment-7226</guid>
		<description>Great post!

I was wondering, do you think that those who advocate policies aimed at maximizing self-reported happiness would, if they were consistent, have to support policies that do things like &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5676012956512384817&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; (video of a guy fooled by his friends into thinking he has a winning lottery ticket)?  I suspect that the absolute difference between the guy&#039;s self-reported happiness, while under the illusion of his lottery win, and his normal self-reported happiness level was greater than the fall it took upon realizing he didn&#039;t really win.

My point is that happiness is a response to the perception that good things are happening.  It isn&#039;t really valuable if good things aren&#039;t really happening.

What we should want to maximize are the good things, and that comes from (as you say) promoting wealth-creation.  Other good things that can help us are better ideas about life and the world, but that&#039;s beyond the scope of government policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>I was wondering, do you think that those who advocate policies aimed at maximizing self-reported happiness would, if they were consistent, have to support policies that do things like <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5676012956512384817" rel="nofollow">this</a> (video of a guy fooled by his friends into thinking he has a winning lottery ticket)?  I suspect that the absolute difference between the guy&#8217;s self-reported happiness, while under the illusion of his lottery win, and his normal self-reported happiness level was greater than the fall it took upon realizing he didn&#8217;t really win.</p>
<p>My point is that happiness is a response to the perception that good things are happening.  It isn&#8217;t really valuable if good things aren&#8217;t really happening.</p>
<p>What we should want to maximize are the good things, and that comes from (as you say) promoting wealth-creation.  Other good things that can help us are better ideas about life and the world, but that&#8217;s beyond the scope of government policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GilM</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/#comment-7231</link>
		<dc:creator>GilM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=866#comment-7231</guid>
		<description>Great post!

I was wondering, do you think that those who advocate policies aimed at maximizing self-reported happiness would, if they were consistent, have to support policies that do things like &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5676012956512384817&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; (video of a guy fooled by his friends into thinking he has a winning lottery ticket)?  I suspect that the absolute difference between the guy&#039;s self-reported happiness, while under the illusion of his lottery win, and his normal self-reported happiness level was greater than the fall it took upon realizing he didn&#039;t really win.

My point is that happiness is a response to the perception that good things are happening.  It isn&#039;t really valuable if good things aren&#039;t really happening.

What we should want to maximize are the good things, and that comes from (as you say) promoting wealth-creation.  Other good things that can help us are better ideas about life and the world, but that&#039;s beyond the scope of government policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>I was wondering, do you think that those who advocate policies aimed at maximizing self-reported happiness would, if they were consistent, have to support policies that do things like <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5676012956512384817" rel="nofollow">this</a> (video of a guy fooled by his friends into thinking he has a winning lottery ticket)?  I suspect that the absolute difference between the guy&#8217;s self-reported happiness, while under the illusion of his lottery win, and his normal self-reported happiness level was greater than the fall it took upon realizing he didn&#8217;t really win.</p>
<p>My point is that happiness is a response to the perception that good things are happening.  It isn&#8217;t really valuable if good things aren&#8217;t really happening.</p>
<p>What we should want to maximize are the good things, and that comes from (as you say) promoting wealth-creation.  Other good things that can help us are better ideas about life and the world, but that&#8217;s beyond the scope of government policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon Richman</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/#comment-7225</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=866#comment-7225</guid>
		<description>Absolutely fascinating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely fascinating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon Richman</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/30/is-the-flat-trend-in-self-reported-happiness-a-problem/#comment-7230</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=866#comment-7230</guid>
		<description>Absolutely fascinating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely fascinating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

