<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Status Frenzy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keller Williams Realty</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7154</link>
		<dc:creator>Keller Williams Realty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7154</guid>
		<description>From a philosophical/idealist perspective, &quot;government&quot; and &quot;happiness&quot; entering the same universe in any conversation is disheartening. Practically speaking, the powers that be (in the U.S. anyway) have made government such an intricate (and some would say invasive) part of our lives that we no longer can do without it/them. Perhaps any discussion of happiness or happiness research should revolve around removing government from the everyday lives of all citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a philosophical/idealist perspective, &#8220;government&#8221; and &#8220;happiness&#8221; entering the same universe in any conversation is disheartening. Practically speaking, the powers that be (in the U.S. anyway) have made government such an intricate (and some would say invasive) part of our lives that we no longer can do without it/them. Perhaps any discussion of happiness or happiness research should revolve around removing government from the everyday lives of all citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keller Williams Realty</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7153</link>
		<dc:creator>Keller Williams Realty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7153</guid>
		<description>From a philosophical/idealist perspective, &quot;government&quot; and &quot;happiness&quot; entering the same universe in any conversation is disheartening. Practically speaking, the powers that be (in the U.S. anyway) have made government such an intricate (and some would say invasive) part of our lives that we no longer can do without it/them. Perhaps any discussion of happiness or happiness research should revolve around removing government from the everyday lives of all citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a philosophical/idealist perspective, &#8220;government&#8221; and &#8220;happiness&#8221; entering the same universe in any conversation is disheartening. Practically speaking, the powers that be (in the U.S. anyway) have made government such an intricate (and some would say invasive) part of our lives that we no longer can do without it/them. Perhaps any discussion of happiness or happiness research should revolve around removing government from the everyday lives of all citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Sherwood</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7152</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Sherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 17:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7152</guid>
		<description>Captain America&#039;s shield is not necessarily &lt;i&gt;harder&lt;/i&gt; than plain adamantium, but it is more durable because vibranium absorbs shocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captain America&#8217;s shield is not necessarily <i>harder</i> than plain adamantium, but it is more durable because vibranium absorbs shocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>Captain America&#039;s shield is not necessarily &lt;i&gt;harder&lt;/i&gt; than plain adamantium, but it is more durable because vibranium absorbs shocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captain America&#8217;s shield is not necessarily <i>harder</i> than plain adamantium, but it is more durable because vibranium absorbs shocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7151</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7151</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Waste More, Want More, By Robert H. Frank, Published: December 22, 2005&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Then why do people buy the expensive mechanical watches? Edward Faber of the Aaron Faber Gallery in Manhattan recently described buyers of these watches as men from 30 to 50 who want &quot;this &#039;power tool,&#039; this instrument on their wrist that distinguishes them from the pack.&quot; The problem is that if a watch is to distinguish its owner, it must sell for more than the watches worn by members of the pack. So when the pack spends more, the price of distinguishing oneself also rises. And in the end, no one gains any more distinction than if all had spent less.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is an argument that the &quot;rich&quot; whoever they might be, should be taxed more heavily.

===============

Here is what I think: The obsession of intellectuals and other members of the chattering classes with status envy, conspicuous consumption and income distribution is a reflection of their own insecurities and the tensions of their little world. Most of us out here in flyover country, just don&#039;t get it.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2132709/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Are Journalists Underpaid?
Pity the sad, broke New York Times reporter. By Daniel Gross, Posted Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005, at 6:23 AM ET&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;The New York real-estate boom is claiming a different kind of casualty, according to an article in Sunday&#039;s New York Times. Keying off a new report issued by the Center for an Urban Future, Jennifer Steinhauer noted that, thanks to high housing prices, many of the creative types who work in Manhattan-centered fields like advertising, publishing, and the arts are being priced out of the city. This, presumably, could damage New York in the long run, since it&#039;s an article of faith among nouveau-urban thinkers that the creative classes are a huge economic advantage, as the author Richard Florida has persuasively argued.

It could also damage journalism. The journalists who write these stories about people who can&#039;t afford to live in New York can&#039;t afford to live in New York, either. And that&#039;s a trend that may prove just as corrosive to establishment media as any disruptive technology.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="" rel="nofollow"><br />
Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Waste More, Want More, By Robert H. Frank, Published: December 22, 2005</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Then why do people buy the expensive mechanical watches? Edward Faber of the Aaron Faber Gallery in Manhattan recently described buyers of these watches as men from 30 to 50 who want &#8220;this &#8216;power tool,&#8217; this instrument on their wrist that distinguishes them from the pack.&#8221; The problem is that if a watch is to distinguish its owner, it must sell for more than the watches worn by members of the pack. So when the pack spends more, the price of distinguishing oneself also rises. And in the end, no one gains any more distinction than if all had spent less.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is an argument that the &#8220;rich&#8221; whoever they might be, should be taxed more heavily.</p>
<p>===============</p>
<p>Here is what I think: The obsession of intellectuals and other members of the chattering classes with status envy, conspicuous consumption and income distribution is a reflection of their own insecurities and the tensions of their little world. Most of us out here in flyover country, just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2132709/" rel="nofollow"><br />
Are Journalists Underpaid?<br />
Pity the sad, broke New York Times reporter. By Daniel Gross, Posted Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005, at 6:23 AM ET</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The New York real-estate boom is claiming a different kind of casualty, according to an article in Sunday&#8217;s New York Times. Keying off a new report issued by the Center for an Urban Future, Jennifer Steinhauer noted that, thanks to high housing prices, many of the creative types who work in Manhattan-centered fields like advertising, publishing, and the arts are being priced out of the city. This, presumably, could damage New York in the long run, since it&#8217;s an article of faith among nouveau-urban thinkers that the creative classes are a huge economic advantage, as the author Richard Florida has persuasively argued.</p>
<p>It could also damage journalism. The journalists who write these stories about people who can&#8217;t afford to live in New York can&#8217;t afford to live in New York, either. And that&#8217;s a trend that may prove just as corrosive to establishment media as any disruptive technology.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7162</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7162</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Waste More, Want More, By Robert H. Frank, Published: December 22, 2005&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Then why do people buy the expensive mechanical watches? Edward Faber of the Aaron Faber Gallery in Manhattan recently described buyers of these watches as men from 30 to 50 who want &quot;this &#039;power tool,&#039; this instrument on their wrist that distinguishes them from the pack.&quot; The problem is that if a watch is to distinguish its owner, it must sell for more than the watches worn by members of the pack. So when the pack spends more, the price of distinguishing oneself also rises. And in the end, no one gains any more distinction than if all had spent less.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is an argument that the &quot;rich&quot; whoever they might be, should be taxed more heavily.

===============

Here is what I think: The obsession of intellectuals and other members of the chattering classes with status envy, conspicuous consumption and income distribution is a reflection of their own insecurities and the tensions of their little world. Most of us out here in flyover country, just don&#039;t get it.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2132709/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Are Journalists Underpaid?
Pity the sad, broke New York Times reporter. By Daniel Gross, Posted Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005, at 6:23 AM ET&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The New York real-estate boom is claiming a different kind of casualty, according to an article in Sunday&#039;s New York Times. Keying off a new report issued by the Center for an Urban Future, Jennifer Steinhauer noted that, thanks to high housing prices, many of the creative types who work in Manhattan-centered fields like advertising, publishing, and the arts are being priced out of the city. This, presumably, could damage New York in the long run, since it&#039;s an article of faith among nouveau-urban thinkers that the creative classes are a huge economic advantage, as the author Richard Florida has persuasively argued.

It could also damage journalism. The journalists who write these stories about people who can&#039;t afford to live in New York can&#039;t afford to live in New York, either. And that&#039;s a trend that may prove just as corrosive to establishment media as any disruptive technology.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="" rel="nofollow"><br />
Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Waste More, Want More, By Robert H. Frank, Published: December 22, 2005</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Then why do people buy the expensive mechanical watches? Edward Faber of the Aaron Faber Gallery in Manhattan recently described buyers of these watches as men from 30 to 50 who want &#8220;this &#8216;power tool,&#8217; this instrument on their wrist that distinguishes them from the pack.&#8221; The problem is that if a watch is to distinguish its owner, it must sell for more than the watches worn by members of the pack. So when the pack spends more, the price of distinguishing oneself also rises. And in the end, no one gains any more distinction than if all had spent less.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is an argument that the &#8220;rich&#8221; whoever they might be, should be taxed more heavily.</p>
<p>===============</p>
<p>Here is what I think: The obsession of intellectuals and other members of the chattering classes with status envy, conspicuous consumption and income distribution is a reflection of their own insecurities and the tensions of their little world. Most of us out here in flyover country, just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2132709/" rel="nofollow"><br />
Are Journalists Underpaid?<br />
Pity the sad, broke New York Times reporter. By Daniel Gross, Posted Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005, at 6:23 AM ET</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The New York real-estate boom is claiming a different kind of casualty, according to an article in Sunday&#8217;s New York Times. Keying off a new report issued by the Center for an Urban Future, Jennifer Steinhauer noted that, thanks to high housing prices, many of the creative types who work in Manhattan-centered fields like advertising, publishing, and the arts are being priced out of the city. This, presumably, could damage New York in the long run, since it&#8217;s an article of faith among nouveau-urban thinkers that the creative classes are a huge economic advantage, as the author Richard Florida has persuasively argued.</p>
<p>It could also damage journalism. The journalists who write these stories about people who can&#8217;t afford to live in New York can&#8217;t afford to live in New York, either. And that&#8217;s a trend that may prove just as corrosive to establishment media as any disruptive technology.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7150</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7150</guid>
		<description>Also, I&#039;d like to take this chance to leave the inappropriately off-topic comment that I love the new look of your blog.  And I love even more that you ditched MT for Wordpress (being something of an ubergeek myself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I&#8217;d like to take this chance to leave the inappropriately off-topic comment that I love the new look of your blog.  And I love even more that you ditched MT for WordPress (being something of an ubergeek myself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7161</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7161</guid>
		<description>Also, I&#039;d like to take this chance to leave the inappropriately off-topic comment that I love the new look of your blog.  And I love even more that you ditched MT for Wordpress (being something of an ubergeek myself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I&#8217;d like to take this chance to leave the inappropriately off-topic comment that I love the new look of your blog.  And I love even more that you ditched MT for WordPress (being something of an ubergeek myself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7149</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7149</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Captain America’s shield is made of a one-of-a-kind adamantium-vibranium compound. . . .&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is the best thing I&#039;ve learned from this blog in years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Captain America’s shield is made of a one-of-a-kind adamantium-vibranium compound. . . .</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This is the best thing I&#8217;ve learned from this blog in years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7160</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7160</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Captain America’s shield is made of a one-of-a-kind adamantium-vibranium compound. . . .&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is the best thing I&#039;ve learned from this blog in years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Captain America’s shield is made of a one-of-a-kind adamantium-vibranium compound. . . .</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This is the best thing I&#8217;ve learned from this blog in years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7148</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7148</guid>
		<description>R.J., Your geekery is blinding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.J., Your geekery is blinding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7159</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7159</guid>
		<description>R.J., Your geekery is blinding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.J., Your geekery is blinding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. Lehmann</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7147</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. Lehmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7147</guid>
		<description>Allow me to unsheath the ubergeek who lives inside me to point out that, while Wolverine&#039;s bones are made of adamantium, Captain America&#039;s shield is made of a one-of-a-kind adamantium-vibranium compound, which is even stronger and harder than true adamantium. So, the answer, theoretically, is yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to unsheath the ubergeek who lives inside me to point out that, while Wolverine&#8217;s bones are made of adamantium, Captain America&#8217;s shield is made of a one-of-a-kind adamantium-vibranium compound, which is even stronger and harder than true adamantium. So, the answer, theoretically, is yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J. Lehmann</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7158</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J. Lehmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7158</guid>
		<description>Allow me to unsheath the ubergeek who lives inside me to point out that, while Wolverine&#039;s bones are made of adamantium, Captain America&#039;s shield is made of a one-of-a-kind adamantium-vibranium compound, which is even stronger and harder than true adamantium. So, the answer, theoretically, is yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to unsheath the ubergeek who lives inside me to point out that, while Wolverine&#8217;s bones are made of adamantium, Captain America&#8217;s shield is made of a one-of-a-kind adamantium-vibranium compound, which is even stronger and harder than true adamantium. So, the answer, theoretically, is yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/12/19/status-frenzy/#comment-7146</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=855#comment-7146</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s too bad happiness research gets mapped onto ongoing political arguments as fast as it is generated.  It&#039;s pretty easy to see people who&#039;s main agenda is to attack (or support) &quot;the market&quot; or &quot;the state&quot; picking and choosing.

My (perhaps moderate) position is that most semi-affluent people are in an &lt;b&gt;unconscious&lt;/b&gt; status competition, and that they could benefit from a little education.  There&#039;s no reason that has to come from &quot;the state.&quot;  It could come from the blogs, if they weren&#039;t too busy with politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s too bad happiness research gets mapped onto ongoing political arguments as fast as it is generated.  It&#8217;s pretty easy to see people who&#8217;s main agenda is to attack (or support) &#8220;the market&#8221; or &#8220;the state&#8221; picking and choosing.</p>
<p>My (perhaps moderate) position is that most semi-affluent people are in an <b>unconscious</b> status competition, and that they could benefit from a little education.  There&#8217;s no reason that has to come from &#8220;the state.&#8221;  It could come from the blogs, if they weren&#8217;t too busy with politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

