Comments on: Is Childbirth National Service?

By: Marvin McConoughey

Marvin McConoughey — Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:58:45 +0000

A world of six billion people and mass poverty is not in need of higher population. Our country already suffers from declining petroleum production, rising environmental maintenance costs, limited water resources, and massive trade deficits. Rising population threatens a lower standard of living for future Americans, more rapid environmental deterioration, greater competition for farmland and housing, even faster depletion of natural resources and, eventually, food shortages and higher risk of disease epidemics.

By: Marvin McConoughey

Marvin McConoughey — Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:58:00 +0000

By: Lynn

Lynn — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:23:00 +0000

Thought you might like to see this. You're mentioned in it. http://www.livejournal.com/community/cf_hardcore/1165412.html

By: Gruntled

Gruntled — Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:14:00 +0000

I think parenthood is not state service, but it is national service. I elaborate on this point at http://gruntledcenter.blogspot.com/.

By: Laurie

Laurie — Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:26:00 +0000

Australia introduced an incentive program last year, aimed at encouraging people to have more children. The family receives $2,300 for each child. The Treasurer said, when interviewed, “You should have..one for your husband, one for your wife, and one for your country.”

By: Reginleif

Reginleif — Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:49:00 +0000

I like the idea of pro-family policy (as long as that includes a non-bigoted notion of the family).

So would a childfree couple be thought of as a family? Guess not, from the rest of your post… you’re not “really” part of a faaammmbleeee unless you’ve sprogged.

By: Chris Farris

Chris Farris — Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:01:00 +0000

Ok, am I the only one who isn’t totally creeped out between this article and the Nazi’s desire for the women to bear more children to support the Reich?

Oh, and sorry for invoking Godwin’s law, but this these similarities are creepy.

By: Famous J

Famous J — Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:35:00 +0000

You talk about trying to maintain the public/private distinction. What, exactly, is marriage if not a massive intrusion of the public into the private?

At some point, the government decided that A) people are going to get married and B) this is a good thing, and so they put their stamp of approval on it, and lavish people who get married with whatever benefits they could to dream up.

In principle, this is no different than what Douhat and Salam are proposing, only replace “get married” with “have children”.

Having said that, I agree that they could indeed come up with a less creepy way of putting it.

By: blammo

blammo — Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:05:00 +0000

This is the inverse of China’s “One child” policy, but substitutes social engineering instead of force.

This sounds suspiciously democrat. Wouldn’t a true conservative argue that the best way to encourage people to have more children would be to lower the average American’s tax burden, and let nature take its course?

By: brig@ddt.com

brig@ddt.com — Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:51:00 +0000

This is already policy. What is the child tax credit? $1000 per kid?

By: Wintermute

Wintermute — Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:03:00 +0000

Governments already subsidize childbirth highly. “Free” K-12 schooling and subsidized higher education tuition and grants, free or subsidized day care, tax and Social Security benefits for stay-at-home spouses.

By: Castillon

Castillon — Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:09:00 +0000

Will Wilkinson,

Try:

Koonz, The Nazi Conscience

Koonz, Mothers in the Fatherland: Women, the Family and Nazi Politics

Stepheson, Women in Nazi Germany

By: Brian Patrick Moore

Brian Patrick Moore — Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:38:00 +0000

Nice. You summed exactly how I feel about lots of things — I think they’re nice, but they don’t need to be subsidized/controlled/regulated.

By: jb

jb — Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:25:00 +0000

Will,

Re: The Handmainds Tale – Don’t waste your time. The book is, IMO, pedantic and annoying. Watch the movie instead – much less time spent, and exactly the same message.

By: Will Wilkinson

Will Wilkinson — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:33:00 +0000

Steve, No, I haven’t. I’ll give it a shot.