<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adapting Minds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/05/02/adapting-minds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/05/02/adapting-minds/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eek</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/05/02/adapting-minds/#comment-5229</link>
		<dc:creator>Eek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=697#comment-5229</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the debunk of Buller: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/buller.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/buller.htm&lt;/a&gt;

As for Gould: The only part I know of is conflicts around &quot;Puntuated Equilibrium&quot; - Gould is claiming he&#039;s got a paradigm shift, the rest of evolutionists say &quot;That&#039;s what we&#039;ve been saying the entire time&quot; (including quotes from The Origin of The Species to show it as orthodox.)

I&#039;m not qualified to have an opinion if they or he is right.

-Eek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the debunk of Buller: <a href="http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/buller.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/buller.htm</a></p>
<p>As for Gould: The only part I know of is conflicts around &#8220;Puntuated Equilibrium&#8221; &#8211; Gould is claiming he&#8217;s got a paradigm shift, the rest of evolutionists say &#8220;That&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve been saying the entire time&#8221; (including quotes from The Origin of The Species to show it as orthodox.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not qualified to have an opinion if they or he is right.</p>
<p>-Eek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razib</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/05/02/adapting-minds/#comment-5228</link>
		<dc:creator>razib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=697#comment-5228</guid>
		<description>Is there some egregious incident Gould was involved with that I&#039;ve missed out on?

gould had a far bigger rep. with the public than he had within the discipline of evolutionary psychology.  ergo, he turned his own personal mole-hills (the perception of genuinely eminent evolutionary biologists* like j.m. smith) into paradigm-shifts (public perception).

* gould seems like a decent paleontologist, and some of his ideas like exaptation probably clarified issues that others left implicit in a novel and precise fashion, but, he wasn&#039;t really a revolutionary evolutionary biologist who presented a positive paradigm which others have followed.  perhaps d.s. wilson, with is multi-level stuff, is a real example of someone trying to &quot;shake things up&quot; by moving in a different direction instead of turning corrections into the whole story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some egregious incident Gould was involved with that I&#8217;ve missed out on?</p>
<p>gould had a far bigger rep. with the public than he had within the discipline of evolutionary psychology.  ergo, he turned his own personal mole-hills (the perception of genuinely eminent evolutionary biologists* like j.m. smith) into paradigm-shifts (public perception).</p>
<p>* gould seems like a decent paleontologist, and some of his ideas like exaptation probably clarified issues that others left implicit in a novel and precise fashion, but, he wasn&#8217;t really a revolutionary evolutionary biologist who presented a positive paradigm which others have followed.  perhaps d.s. wilson, with is multi-level stuff, is a real example of someone trying to &#8220;shake things up&#8221; by moving in a different direction instead of turning corrections into the whole story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washerdreyer</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/05/02/adapting-minds/#comment-5227</link>
		<dc:creator>washerdreyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=697#comment-5227</guid>
		<description>I am consistently mystified by blogospheric Gould bashing.  I&#039;m not under the impression that it&#039;s a left/right thing, though I could be wrong.  At first I thought it was just people who just dislike popularizers of science, but I&#039;ve pretty much dropped that theory as well.  Is there some egregious incident Gould was involved with that I&#039;ve missed out on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am consistently mystified by blogospheric Gould bashing.  I&#8217;m not under the impression that it&#8217;s a left/right thing, though I could be wrong.  At first I thought it was just people who just dislike popularizers of science, but I&#8217;ve pretty much dropped that theory as well.  Is there some egregious incident Gould was involved with that I&#8217;ve missed out on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washerdreyer</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/05/02/adapting-minds/#comment-5223</link>
		<dc:creator>washerdreyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=697#comment-5223</guid>
		<description>I am consistently mystified by blogospheric Gould bashing.  I&#039;m not under the impression that it&#039;s a left/right thing, though I could be wrong.  At first I thought it was just people who just dislike popularizers of science, but I&#039;ve pretty much dropped that theory as well.  Is there some egregious incident Gould was involved with that I&#039;ve missed out on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am consistently mystified by blogospheric Gould bashing.  I&#8217;m not under the impression that it&#8217;s a left/right thing, though I could be wrong.  At first I thought it was just people who just dislike popularizers of science, but I&#8217;ve pretty much dropped that theory as well.  Is there some egregious incident Gould was involved with that I&#8217;ve missed out on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razib</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/05/02/adapting-minds/#comment-5224</link>
		<dc:creator>razib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=697#comment-5224</guid>
		<description>Is there some egregious incident Gould was involved with that I&#039;ve missed out on?

gould had a far bigger rep. with the public than he had within the discipline of evolutionary psychology.  ergo, he turned his own personal mole-hills (the perception of genuinely eminent evolutionary biologists* like j.m. smith) into paradigm-shifts (public perception).

* gould seems like a decent paleontologist, and some of his ideas like exaptation probably clarified issues that others left implicit in a novel and precise fashion, but, he wasn&#039;t really a revolutionary evolutionary biologist who presented a positive paradigm which others have followed.  perhaps d.s. wilson, with is multi-level stuff, is a real example of someone trying to &quot;shake things up&quot; by moving in a different direction instead of turning corrections into the whole story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some egregious incident Gould was involved with that I&#8217;ve missed out on?</p>
<p>gould had a far bigger rep. with the public than he had within the discipline of evolutionary psychology.  ergo, he turned his own personal mole-hills (the perception of genuinely eminent evolutionary biologists* like j.m. smith) into paradigm-shifts (public perception).</p>
<p>* gould seems like a decent paleontologist, and some of his ideas like exaptation probably clarified issues that others left implicit in a novel and precise fashion, but, he wasn&#8217;t really a revolutionary evolutionary biologist who presented a positive paradigm which others have followed.  perhaps d.s. wilson, with is multi-level stuff, is a real example of someone trying to &#8220;shake things up&#8221; by moving in a different direction instead of turning corrections into the whole story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eek</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/05/02/adapting-minds/#comment-5225</link>
		<dc:creator>Eek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=697#comment-5225</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the debunk of Buller: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/buller.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/buller.htm&lt;/a&gt;

As for Gould: The only part I know of is conflicts around &quot;Puntuated Equilibrium&quot; - Gould is claiming he&#039;s got a paradigm shift, the rest of evolutionists say &quot;That&#039;s what we&#039;ve been saying the entire time&quot; (including quotes from The Origin of The Species to show it as orthodox.)

I&#039;m not qualified to have an opinion if they or he is right.

-Eek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the debunk of Buller: <a href="http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/buller.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/buller.htm</a></p>
<p>As for Gould: The only part I know of is conflicts around &#8220;Puntuated Equilibrium&#8221; &#8211; Gould is claiming he&#8217;s got a paradigm shift, the rest of evolutionists say &#8220;That&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve been saying the entire time&#8221; (including quotes from The Origin of The Species to show it as orthodox.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not qualified to have an opinion if they or he is right.</p>
<p>-Eek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Expression</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/05/02/adapting-minds/#comment-5226</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Expression</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=697#comment-5226</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Adapting Minds, David Bulller &amp; Evolutionary Psychology&lt;/strong&gt;

I wasn&#039;t going to comment on this until I later, but a confluence of events have prompted me to offer (quick) opinions on the book Adapting Minds, by David J. Buller. Steve has weighed in, and now Buller&#039;s former student,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Adapting Minds, David Bulller &#038; Evolutionary Psychology</strong></p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t going to comment on this until I later, but a confluence of events have prompted me to offer (quick) opinions on the book Adapting Minds, by David J. Buller. Steve has weighed in, and now Buller&#8217;s former student,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

