<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Government : Nice, But Unnecessary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/03/28/good-government-nice-but-unnecessary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/03/28/good-government-nice-but-unnecessary/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/03/28/good-government-nice-but-unnecessary/#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=678#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>&#039;The more effective, efficient, trustworthy, non-corrupt, credible, etc. a government is, the less you will need government.&#039;

Interesting post, but I&#039;m not sure about this sentence. The fact that government is most effective as a credible threat keeping people in order rather than when trying to establish that credible threat is pretty well known, but it doesn&#039;t therefore follow that you need government less when it&#039;s there, just that when security needs are met they tend to be taken for granted (eg. the fact that a corporate network hasn&#039;t been hacked in the last year doesn&#039;t mean that they don&#039;t need a firewall as much).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The more effective, efficient, trustworthy, non-corrupt, credible, etc. a government is, the less you will need government.&#8217;</p>
<p>Interesting post, but I&#8217;m not sure about this sentence. The fact that government is most effective as a credible threat keeping people in order rather than when trying to establish that credible threat is pretty well known, but it doesn&#8217;t therefore follow that you need government less when it&#8217;s there, just that when security needs are met they tend to be taken for granted (eg. the fact that a corporate network hasn&#8217;t been hacked in the last year doesn&#8217;t mean that they don&#8217;t need a firewall as much).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/03/28/good-government-nice-but-unnecessary/#comment-4988</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=678#comment-4988</guid>
		<description>&#039;The more effective, efficient, trustworthy, non-corrupt, credible, etc. a government is, the less you will need government.&#039;

Interesting post, but I&#039;m not sure about this sentence. The fact that government is most effective as a credible threat keeping people in order rather than when trying to establish that credible threat is pretty well known, but it doesn&#039;t therefore follow that you need government less when it&#039;s there, just that when security needs are met they tend to be taken for granted (eg. the fact that a corporate network hasn&#039;t been hacked in the last year doesn&#039;t mean that they don&#039;t need a firewall as much).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The more effective, efficient, trustworthy, non-corrupt, credible, etc. a government is, the less you will need government.&#8217;</p>
<p>Interesting post, but I&#8217;m not sure about this sentence. The fact that government is most effective as a credible threat keeping people in order rather than when trying to establish that credible threat is pretty well known, but it doesn&#8217;t therefore follow that you need government less when it&#8217;s there, just that when security needs are met they tend to be taken for granted (eg. the fact that a corporate network hasn&#8217;t been hacked in the last year doesn&#8217;t mean that they don&#8217;t need a firewall as much).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

