<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is &quot;Superannuation&quot; a Risk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/03/17/is-superannuation-a-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/03/17/is-superannuation-a-risk/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Outside The Beltway</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/03/17/is-superannuation-a-risk/#comment-4952</link>
		<dc:creator>Outside The Beltway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=671#comment-4952</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Beltway Traffic Jam&lt;/strong&gt;

The daily linkfest:
Will Wilkinson explains why people should be glad to get screwed out of their Social Security.
David Shuster thinks a couple of players were pretty clever in their answers to Congress yesterday.
Sean Hackbarth notes voter fraud ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Beltway Traffic Jam</strong></p>
<p>The daily linkfest:<br />
Will Wilkinson explains why people should be glad to get screwed out of their Social Security.<br />
David Shuster thinks a couple of players were pretty clever in their answers to Congress yesterday.<br />
Sean Hackbarth notes voter fraud &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sick Transit</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/03/17/is-superannuation-a-risk/#comment-4953</link>
		<dc:creator>Sick Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=671#comment-4953</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social Insecurity&lt;/strong&gt;

Will Wilkinson makes an interesting historical point in this this post, but completely misses the boat on his main argument. He writes:

One of the mantras of social security reform obstructionists is: &quot;Don&#039;t think about rates of return. It&#039;s soci...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social Insecurity</strong></p>
<p>Will Wilkinson makes an interesting historical point in this this post, but completely misses the boat on his main argument. He writes:</p>
<p>One of the mantras of social security reform obstructionists is: &#8220;Don&#8217;t think about rates of return. It&#8217;s soci&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pejmanesque</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2005/03/17/is-superannuation-a-risk/#comment-4954</link>
		<dc:creator>Pejmanesque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=671#comment-4954</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;THE PROPER CONCEPTION OF SOCIAL SECURITY&#039;S ROLE&lt;/strong&gt;

Will Wilkinson has it quite right: One of the mantras of social security reform obstructionists is: &quot;Don&#039;t think about rates of return. It&#039;s social insurance stupid!&quot; That is, SS is a big risk pooling scheme, and it&#039;s working just fine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>THE PROPER CONCEPTION OF SOCIAL SECURITY&#8217;S ROLE</strong></p>
<p>Will Wilkinson has it quite right: One of the mantras of social security reform obstructionists is: &#8220;Don&#8217;t think about rates of return. It&#8217;s social insurance stupid!&#8221; That is, SS is a big risk pooling scheme, and it&#8217;s working just fine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

