<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Reason. Culture War. Two Great Tastes that Don&#039;t Taste Great Together?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/16/public-reason-culture-war-two-great-tastes-that-dont-taste-great-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/16/public-reason-culture-war-two-great-tastes-that-dont-taste-great-together/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rowe</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/16/public-reason-culture-war-two-great-tastes-that-dont-taste-great-together/#comment-2148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=544#comment-2148</guid>
		<description>And that&#039;s exactly what I did.  For those interested check out:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s exactly what I did.  For those interested check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html" rel="nofollow">http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rowe</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/16/public-reason-culture-war-two-great-tastes-that-dont-taste-great-together/#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=544#comment-2149</guid>
		<description>And that&#039;s exactly what I did.  For those interested check out:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s exactly what I did.  For those interested check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html" rel="nofollow">http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rowe, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/16/public-reason-culture-war-two-great-tastes-that-dont-taste-great-together/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rowe, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=544#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>One thing that you DIDN&#039;T reference in this post.  And this is something that Volokh has referenced recently without mentioning Rawls (someblogger, maybe me, has to connect your two ideas) is that Rawls held that beliefs derived SOLELY from appeals to Revelation did not qualify as Public Reason.

Therefore, cultural warriors (Protestant fundies) who argue b/n Revelation alone, can&#039;t be good Rawlsians.  But Catholics who might appeal to natural law for their socially conservative positions, can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that you DIDN&#8217;T reference in this post.  And this is something that Volokh has referenced recently without mentioning Rawls (someblogger, maybe me, has to connect your two ideas) is that Rawls held that beliefs derived SOLELY from appeals to Revelation did not qualify as Public Reason.</p>
<p>Therefore, cultural warriors (Protestant fundies) who argue b/n Revelation alone, can&#8217;t be good Rawlsians.  But Catholics who might appeal to natural law for their socially conservative positions, can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rowe, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/16/public-reason-culture-war-two-great-tastes-that-dont-taste-great-together/#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rowe, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=544#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>One thing that you DIDN&#039;T reference in this post.  And this is something that Volokh has referenced recently without mentioning Rawls (someblogger, maybe me, has to connect your two ideas) is that Rawls held that beliefs derived SOLELY from appeals to Revelation did not qualify as Public Reason.

Therefore, cultural warriors (Protestant fundies) who argue b/n Revelation alone, can&#039;t be good Rawlsians.  But Catholics who might appeal to natural law for their socially conservative positions, can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that you DIDN&#8217;T reference in this post.  And this is something that Volokh has referenced recently without mentioning Rawls (someblogger, maybe me, has to connect your two ideas) is that Rawls held that beliefs derived SOLELY from appeals to Revelation did not qualify as Public Reason.</p>
<p>Therefore, cultural warriors (Protestant fundies) who argue b/n Revelation alone, can&#8217;t be good Rawlsians.  But Catholics who might appeal to natural law for their socially conservative positions, can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rowe, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/16/public-reason-culture-war-two-great-tastes-that-dont-taste-great-together/#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rowe, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=544#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>One thing that you DIDN&#039;T reference in this post.  And this is something that Volokh has referenced recently without mentioning Rawls (someblogger, maybe me, has to connect your two ideas) is that Rawls held that beliefs derived SOLELY from appeals to Revelation did not qualify as Public Reason.

Therefore, cultural warriors (Protestant fundies) who argue b/n Revelation alone, can&#039;t be good Rawlsians.  But Catholics who might appeal to natural law for their socially conservative positions, can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that you DIDN&#8217;T reference in this post.  And this is something that Volokh has referenced recently without mentioning Rawls (someblogger, maybe me, has to connect your two ideas) is that Rawls held that beliefs derived SOLELY from appeals to Revelation did not qualify as Public Reason.</p>
<p>Therefore, cultural warriors (Protestant fundies) who argue b/n Revelation alone, can&#8217;t be good Rawlsians.  But Catholics who might appeal to natural law for their socially conservative positions, can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rowe</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/16/public-reason-culture-war-two-great-tastes-that-dont-taste-great-together/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=544#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>And that&#039;s exactly what I did.  For those interested check out:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s exactly what I did.  For those interested check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html" rel="nofollow">http://jonrowe.blogspot.com/2004/11/public-reason-law-and-morality.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#1505;&#1491;&#1504;&#1488;&#1493;&#1514; &#1497;&#1497;&#1503;</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/16/public-reason-culture-war-two-great-tastes-that-dont-taste-great-together/#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>&#1505;&#1491;&#1504;&#1488;&#1493;&#1514; &#1497;&#1497;&#1503;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=544#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&#1505;&#1491;&#1504;&#1488;&#1493;&#1514; &#1497;&#1497;&#1503;&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for your interest in &#1489;&#1488;&#1512;&#1502;&#1504;&#1497;&#1501; &#1502;&#1511;&#1510;&#1493;&#1506;&#1497;&#1497;&#1501;. We are an Thank you for your interest in &#1489;&#1488;&#1512;&#1502;&#1504;&#1497;&#1501; &#1502;&#1511;&#1510;&#1493;&#1506;&#1497;&#1497;&#1501;. We are an &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.mybar.ws/&#1489;&#1488;&#1512;&#1502;&#1504;&#1497;&#1501;-&#1502;&#1511;&#1510;&amp;#1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#1505;&#1491;&#1504;&#1488;&#1493;&#1514; &#1497;&#1497;&#1503;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for your interest in &#1489;&#1488;&#1512;&#1502;&#1504;&#1497;&#1501; &#1502;&#1511;&#1510;&#1493;&#1506;&#1497;&#1497;&#1501;. We are an Thank you for your interest in &#1489;&#1488;&#1512;&#1502;&#1504;&#1497;&#1501; &#1502;&#1511;&#1510;&#1493;&#1506;&#1497;&#1497;&#1501;. We are an <a href=&#8217;http://www.mybar.ws/&#1489;&#1488;&#1512;&#1502;&#1504;&#1497;&#1501;-&#1502;&#1511;&#1510;&#1&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

