<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Moral of the Story?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: McClain</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>McClain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>Even if I weren&#039;t a Christian, I might take pleasure in calling myself one, since a simple profession of Christian faith is, evidently, enough to induce anile paroxysms of terror in certain members of the self-appointed intellectual elite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if I weren&#8217;t a Christian, I might take pleasure in calling myself one, since a simple profession of Christian faith is, evidently, enough to induce anile paroxysms of terror in certain members of the self-appointed intellectual elite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UGH!</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>UGH!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>What is your problem, Chuck? A man from Oklahoma, who believes in executing &quot;abortionists&quot;, was just elected to the Senate of the U.S.. Are you blind to the ongoing war, IN THIS COUNTRY, between modern, scientific, civilized humanistic thought and religious fanaticism and barbarism. And, have you so easily forgotten the bombings of Women&#039;s health clinics and killings of doctors by homicidal Christian loonies. Don&#039;t you realize that religious intolerance is the historical trademark of Christianity and Islam? Bush&#039;s election ploy to push for altering the Constitution to make bigotry the law of the land doesn&#039;t bother you.? Chuck, take back your blatant slander of Nicholas; it&#039;s just not right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your problem, Chuck? A man from Oklahoma, who believes in executing &#8220;abortionists&#8221;, was just elected to the Senate of the U.S.. Are you blind to the ongoing war, IN THIS COUNTRY, between modern, scientific, civilized humanistic thought and religious fanaticism and barbarism. And, have you so easily forgotten the bombings of Women&#8217;s health clinics and killings of doctors by homicidal Christian loonies. Don&#8217;t you realize that religious intolerance is the historical trademark of Christianity and Islam? Bush&#8217;s election ploy to push for altering the Constitution to make bigotry the law of the land doesn&#8217;t bother you.? Chuck, take back your blatant slander of Nicholas; it&#8217;s just not right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>The word &quot;these&quot; was supposed to be linked to this e-mail address:

usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive_Index/Al_Qaeda_and_Taliban_Atrocities.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;these&#8221; was supposed to be linked to this e-mail address:</p>
<p>usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive_Index/Al_Qaeda_and_Taliban_Atrocities.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>Nicholas,

I&#039;ll accept your use of the phrase &quot;American Taliban&quot; when Christian conservatives start committing atrocities like &lt;a&gt;these.&lt;/a&gt;

In the meantime, a commitment accuracy would require that you to take back your blatant slander.

I&#039;m an atheist and a libertarian--not a member of the religious right by any definition--but asserting that American religious conservatives are the equivalent of the Taliban is the same as saying that a common bigot is no different from a member of the SS.  It&#039;s just not right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll accept your use of the phrase &#8220;American Taliban&#8221; when Christian conservatives start committing atrocities like <a>these.</a></p>
<p>In the meantime, a commitment accuracy would require that you to take back your blatant slander.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an atheist and a libertarian&#8211;not a member of the religious right by any definition&#8211;but asserting that American religious conservatives are the equivalent of the Taliban is the same as saying that a common bigot is no different from a member of the SS.  It&#8217;s just not right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Falwell</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Falwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>Scott Scheule, so you&#039;re a heathen, pagan, atheist are you? What is your address in D.C. (we&#039;ll find you no matter what) so we can take your evil self into custody and burn your satanic soul at the stake? Rot in hell you Devil!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Scheule, so you&#8217;re a heathen, pagan, atheist are you? What is your address in D.C. (we&#8217;ll find you no matter what) so we can take your evil self into custody and burn your satanic soul at the stake? Rot in hell you Devil!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2004 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>Anonymous Douche,

&quot;Do you reside (that means live) in the Bible Belt and pray to Jesus.&quot;

Assuming that&#039;s a question (maybe periods denote interrogatories in CA), the answer is no, I live in New Jersey, and currently go to school in DC.  I&#039;m an atheist.  This proves that one doesn&#039;t need a deity to realize you&#039;re a moron.

If you want intelligent commentary, it&#039;s better to prime the pump with an intelligent question, not a jumble of ad hominem immaturity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous Douche,</p>
<p>&#8220;Do you reside (that means live) in the Bible Belt and pray to Jesus.&#8221;</p>
<p>Assuming that&#8217;s a question (maybe periods denote interrogatories in CA), the answer is no, I live in New Jersey, and currently go to school in DC.  I&#8217;m an atheist.  This proves that one doesn&#8217;t need a deity to realize you&#8217;re a moron.</p>
<p>If you want intelligent commentary, it&#8217;s better to prime the pump with an intelligent question, not a jumble of ad hominem immaturity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UGH!</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>UGH!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2004 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>I should say that people who are religious are foolish in that aspect of their lives. The more religion is an integral part of their lives the bigger a fool they are. Remember 9/11? The religious fanatics should be killed before they kill us. The biggest creepy fool of all lives in the Whitehouse and gives tax breaks to the wealthy and ease restrictions on polluters and coddles Halliburton. Some kind of old-time religion, huh? Immorality was an issue in the election and their names are Shrubya/Cheney/The Hammer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should say that people who are religious are foolish in that aspect of their lives. The more religion is an integral part of their lives the bigger a fool they are. Remember 9/11? The religious fanatics should be killed before they kill us. The biggest creepy fool of all lives in the Whitehouse and gives tax breaks to the wealthy and ease restrictions on polluters and coddles Halliburton. Some kind of old-time religion, huh? Immorality was an issue in the election and their names are Shrubya/Cheney/The Hammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UGH!</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>UGH!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2004 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>Scotty Boy,

Your comment/insult wasn&#039;t clever at all. Religious people (from the NSEW) are basically  fools and I don&#039;t want to be ruled by them. Are you one of them?

I brought up the idea of breaking up the country so that there might be some intelligent comments. I see that I&#039;m not going to get any, at least not from you. Do you reside (that means live) in the Bible Belt and pray to Jesus. Did you get off on the Passion of the Christ? I thought so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scotty Boy,</p>
<p>Your comment/insult wasn&#8217;t clever at all. Religious people (from the NSEW) are basically  fools and I don&#8217;t want to be ruled by them. Are you one of them?</p>
<p>I brought up the idea of breaking up the country so that there might be some intelligent comments. I see that I&#8217;m not going to get any, at least not from you. Do you reside (that means live) in the Bible Belt and pray to Jesus. Did you get off on the Passion of the Christ? I thought so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Scheule</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Scheule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>&quot;How can we say it was worth it? Why is no one presently talking about dissolving the union?&quot;

As to the first question, many Libertarians don&#039;t think it was worth it.  As to the second, because the precedent has been set.  Personally, I&#039;d be all for it.

&quot;As a Californian, I have little culturally in common with Southerners, I despise their ignorant religiosity and I would be glad to give them their own country. I really have no use for them.&quot;

What aspect of democratic theory necessitates having something culturally in common with your neighbors?  Regardless, your condescending stereotyping of Southerners is exactly what they expect from a Californian, and perhaps, why Kerry lost the election in the first place.

&quot;Would we not be safer if we were no longer the sole super power in the world. This is a strong argument (in my opinion) for dissolving the Union in one form or another.&quot;

Simple rhetorical questions--with or without question marks--do not strong arguments make.  Do you realize the irony you exhibit when you call Southerners idiots?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How can we say it was worth it? Why is no one presently talking about dissolving the union?&#8221;</p>
<p>As to the first question, many Libertarians don&#8217;t think it was worth it.  As to the second, because the precedent has been set.  Personally, I&#8217;d be all for it.</p>
<p>&#8220;As a Californian, I have little culturally in common with Southerners, I despise their ignorant religiosity and I would be glad to give them their own country. I really have no use for them.&#8221;</p>
<p>What aspect of democratic theory necessitates having something culturally in common with your neighbors?  Regardless, your condescending stereotyping of Southerners is exactly what they expect from a Californian, and perhaps, why Kerry lost the election in the first place.</p>
<p>&#8220;Would we not be safer if we were no longer the sole super power in the world. This is a strong argument (in my opinion) for dissolving the Union in one form or another.&#8221;</p>
<p>Simple rhetorical questions&#8211;with or without question marks&#8211;do not strong arguments make.  Do you realize the irony you exhibit when you call Southerners idiots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugh!</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugh!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>I have just one more thing to say. Many people voted for that belligerent dummy Bush because they thought he would better protect us from terrorism. I feel far less safe. Would we not be safer if we were no longer the sole super power in the world. This is a strong argument (in my opinion) for dissolving the Union in one form or another. Wouldn&#039;t No. Korea and Iran and the Muslim fanatics have less to fear if the U.S. were broken into pieces? The U.N. can and should police the world and fight the terrorists. The U.S. as a country just has to go. I&#039;ve convinced myself at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just one more thing to say. Many people voted for that belligerent dummy Bush because they thought he would better protect us from terrorism. I feel far less safe. Would we not be safer if we were no longer the sole super power in the world. This is a strong argument (in my opinion) for dissolving the Union in one form or another. Wouldn&#8217;t No. Korea and Iran and the Muslim fanatics have less to fear if the U.S. were broken into pieces? The U.N. can and should police the world and fight the terrorists. The U.S. as a country just has to go. I&#8217;ve convinced myself at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugh!</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugh!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>I apologize for my ignorance of U.S. history but just why did Lincoln save the Union? The death and devastation wrought by the civil war was mind-boggling. In some ways, we are still fighting it. How can we say it was worth it? Why is no one presently talking about dissolving the union? Czechoslovakia recently broke into the Czech Republic and Slovakia without fanfare. As a Californian, I have little culturally in common with Southerners, I despise their ignorant religiosity and I would be glad to give them their own country. I really have no use for them. Another idea: dissolve the Union entirely and just have a loose federation of states like the former Soviet Union. If it weren&#039;t for the cold weather, I&#039;d make a beeline for Canada. Maybe, I&#039;ll treat myself to a new parka and move there anyway; Will seemed to enjoy his recent trip there. Will, think you&#039;d like living there on a permanent basis? (Btw, I like your travelogues very much.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize for my ignorance of U.S. history but just why did Lincoln save the Union? The death and devastation wrought by the civil war was mind-boggling. In some ways, we are still fighting it. How can we say it was worth it? Why is no one presently talking about dissolving the union? Czechoslovakia recently broke into the Czech Republic and Slovakia without fanfare. As a Californian, I have little culturally in common with Southerners, I despise their ignorant religiosity and I would be glad to give them their own country. I really have no use for them. Another idea: dissolve the Union entirely and just have a loose federation of states like the former Soviet Union. If it weren&#8217;t for the cold weather, I&#8217;d make a beeline for Canada. Maybe, I&#8217;ll treat myself to a new parka and move there anyway; Will seemed to enjoy his recent trip there. Will, think you&#8217;d like living there on a permanent basis? (Btw, I like your travelogues very much.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1712</guid>
		<description>Will,

Could you fill me in on the connection between religiosity and organizational acumen. I don&#039;t understand the connection.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will,</p>
<p>Could you fill me in on the connection between religiosity and organizational acumen. I don&#8217;t understand the connection.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1711</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1711</guid>
		<description>Lindsay, I&#039;m not objecting to liberal anger or resentment, much of which I share. I&#039;m objecting to what I see as a reflexive, counterproductive caricaturing of the Christian right. In fact, I think you&#039;re wrong, or least overly broad, in holding fast to your opinion of fundamentalist ideals, most of which are no more backward, simplistic, and dangerous than &quot;progressive&quot; ideals.  A large part of the reason that Bush won is that these people--the ones with backward, simplistic, and dangerous views--are capable of incredible competence, organization, and implementation of a well-wrought plan. The industry, energy, resolve and efficacy of these religious, Stephen Covey-toting Americans is incredibly impressive, worthy of admiration, and, I would argue, a very healthy, productive part of their conception of American identity, and something Bush successfully tapped into.

I am personally fascinated by the deep cultural link in the US between religiosity and the kind of organizational acumen that runs millions of American businesses and the 2004 election. There is a set of values here that we should respect, emulate, and attempt to detach from the illiberal elements of the right&#039;s political identity.

I no longer get angry, exactly, at people who try to impose their moral conceptions on me (be they mystical or not). It takes too much energy. I do not dispute, however, your entitlement to anger. Go for it. Punch a pillow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lindsay, I&#8217;m not objecting to liberal anger or resentment, much of which I share. I&#8217;m objecting to what I see as a reflexive, counterproductive caricaturing of the Christian right. In fact, I think you&#8217;re wrong, or least overly broad, in holding fast to your opinion of fundamentalist ideals, most of which are no more backward, simplistic, and dangerous than &#8220;progressive&#8221; ideals.  A large part of the reason that Bush won is that these people&#8211;the ones with backward, simplistic, and dangerous views&#8211;are capable of incredible competence, organization, and implementation of a well-wrought plan. The industry, energy, resolve and efficacy of these religious, Stephen Covey-toting Americans is incredibly impressive, worthy of admiration, and, I would argue, a very healthy, productive part of their conception of American identity, and something Bush successfully tapped into.</p>
<p>I am personally fascinated by the deep cultural link in the US between religiosity and the kind of organizational acumen that runs millions of American businesses and the 2004 election. There is a set of values here that we should respect, emulate, and attempt to detach from the illiberal elements of the right&#8217;s political identity.</p>
<p>I no longer get angry, exactly, at people who try to impose their moral conceptions on me (be they mystical or not). It takes too much energy. I do not dispute, however, your entitlement to anger. Go for it. Punch a pillow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Beyerstein</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Beyerstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>You seem to be objecting to the anger and resentment of liberals, not to their lack of understanding of fundamentalist motivations. A lot of hurtful and bigoted things are being said on both sides. Some liberals are dismissing fundamentalists as stupid and backward. Some conservatives are slandering liberals as arrogant hypocritical elitists. Neither set of stereotypes is equivalent to a reasoned argument.

On the other hand, I can recite Christian apologetics with the best of them, but I&#039;m holding fast to my opinion of fundamentalist ideals as backward, simplistic, and dangerous. I&#039;m angry at people who try to impose their mystically-based beliefs on me. Moreover, I&#039;m entitled (and maybe even required) to feel this resentment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be objecting to the anger and resentment of liberals, not to their lack of understanding of fundamentalist motivations. A lot of hurtful and bigoted things are being said on both sides. Some liberals are dismissing fundamentalists as stupid and backward. Some conservatives are slandering liberals as arrogant hypocritical elitists. Neither set of stereotypes is equivalent to a reasoned argument.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I can recite Christian apologetics with the best of them, but I&#8217;m holding fast to my opinion of fundamentalist ideals as backward, simplistic, and dangerous. I&#8217;m angry at people who try to impose their mystically-based beliefs on me. Moreover, I&#8217;m entitled (and maybe even required) to feel this resentment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilkka Kokkarinen</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/03/the-moral-of-the-story/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilkka Kokkarinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=505#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Nicholas Weininger: &quot;People of reason need, for our own safety, to understand the fundies and recognize the sources of their appeal, and posts like yours are a valuable part of doing that. But the American Taliban do not deserve a single particle of our sympathy, any more than the Afghan version. It is time to stop appeasing obscurantism and start fighting it.&quot;

In a later post, Will asks liberals to read a few Left Behind books. I second that suggestion, but for a reason closer to this quote by Nicholas. I have read a few, first simply for the humor value, but the feeling they then evoked in me was what Weimar Jews probably should have felt when Mein Kampf first came out. And what I see in the evangelical blogosphere (e.g. Hugh Hewitt and especially his follower legions) tends to confirm this feeling.

With the massive success of the Left Behind books, American Christians have made their current worldview and goals perfectly explicit. Thanks to these books, I know exactly what they really think about Satan&#039;s servants like me (for example, I have a Ph.D. and don&#039;t believe at all that Earth is a 6,000-year-old center of universe surrounded by firmament) and what they plan to do with us. Especially as their frustration of the rapture being constantly delayed will grow and eventually overflow its weak vessel.

It is also obvious that this anti-reality gang can no longer really be appeased or reasoned with any more than Osama&#039;s gang or the 1930&#039;s Nazis. For those who disagree, please tell me how exactly you would reason with somebody who is psychotic enough to believe that the events of Left Behind will essentially take place within the next few years. Especially now when the re-election of Lord Bush just validated their belief of the coming epic End Times Battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas Weininger: &#8220;People of reason need, for our own safety, to understand the fundies and recognize the sources of their appeal, and posts like yours are a valuable part of doing that. But the American Taliban do not deserve a single particle of our sympathy, any more than the Afghan version. It is time to stop appeasing obscurantism and start fighting it.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a later post, Will asks liberals to read a few Left Behind books. I second that suggestion, but for a reason closer to this quote by Nicholas. I have read a few, first simply for the humor value, but the feeling they then evoked in me was what Weimar Jews probably should have felt when Mein Kampf first came out. And what I see in the evangelical blogosphere (e.g. Hugh Hewitt and especially his follower legions) tends to confirm this feeling.</p>
<p>With the massive success of the Left Behind books, American Christians have made their current worldview and goals perfectly explicit. Thanks to these books, I know exactly what they really think about Satan&#8217;s servants like me (for example, I have a Ph.D. and don&#8217;t believe at all that Earth is a 6,000-year-old center of universe surrounded by firmament) and what they plan to do with us. Especially as their frustration of the rapture being constantly delayed will grow and eventually overflow its weak vessel.</p>
<p>It is also obvious that this anti-reality gang can no longer really be appeased or reasoned with any more than Osama&#8217;s gang or the 1930&#8242;s Nazis. For those who disagree, please tell me how exactly you would reason with somebody who is psychotic enough to believe that the events of Left Behind will essentially take place within the next few years. Especially now when the re-election of Lord Bush just validated their belief of the coming epic End Times Battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

