Comments on: Inter-Blog Popper Wars: The Impotence http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/ The Sweet Release of Reason Sun, 20 May 2012 23:34:36 +0000 hourly 1 By: generic viagra http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-32 generic viagra Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:55:01 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-32 <a href="http://genericviagra.chubbyassistant.com" rel="nofollow">http://genericviagra.chubbyassistant.com</a><br><br>i agree with you mattclar33 :) http://genericviagra.chubbyassistant.com

i agree with you mattclar33 :)

]]> By: generic viagra http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-31 generic viagra Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:55:01 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-31 <a href="http://genericviagra.chubbyassistant.com" rel="nofollow">http://genericviagra.chubbyassistant.com</a><br><br>i agree with you mattclar33 :) http://genericviagra.chubbyassistant.com

i agree with you mattclar33 :)

]]> By: Mattclar33 http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-30 Mattclar33 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:45:29 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-30 Hello my name is Matt I’m older man and I need a treatment for my Erectile Dysfunction problem, I need to know if the generic Viagra works. I found this website <a href="http://www.xlpharmacy.com/generic-viagra/" rel="nofollow">Generic Viagra</a> <a href="http://www.xlpharmacy.com/generic-viagra/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xlpharmacy.com/generic-viagra/</a> it seems to be ok but I’m not sure. Can anybody help me with some info about this website or maybe recommend another website that sales generic Viagra .... thank you Matt Hello my name is Matt I’m older man and I need a treatment for my Erectile Dysfunction problem, I need to know if the generic Viagra works. I found this website Generic Viagra http://www.xlpharmacy.com/generic-viagra/ it seems to be ok but I’m not sure. Can anybody help me with some info about this website or maybe recommend another website that sales generic Viagra …. thank you Matt

]]> By: mensexalhealthbook.com http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-29 mensexalhealthbook.com Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:34:29 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-29 Great blog I totally agree with you Great blog I totally agree with you

]]> By: mensexalhealthbook.com http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-37 mensexalhealthbook.com Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:34:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-37 Great blog I totally agree with you Great blog I totally agree with you

]]> By: mensexalhealthbook.com http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-38 mensexalhealthbook.com Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:34:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-38 Great blog I totally agree with you Great blog I totally agree with you

]]> By: Michael Orme http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-28 Michael Orme Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:05:32 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-28 Sorry,must have missed something - Quote: 'There is no way to assign any positive probability to any proposition'. Which Popper is this? Surely not the author of 'The Logic of Scientific Discovery'? His first attempt to uinderstand probability here is later developed (Sorry, can't remember the reference) into a full-blown objective account, in which probabilities express actually existing propensities in the world. Worse for your argument above, Popper's starting point is that ('Conjectures and Refutations') the probablity of a non-white swan before the discovery of Australia was zero. This shows that any given scientific theory is in some way false or inadequate Sorry,must have missed something – Quote: ‘There is no way to assign any positive probability to any proposition’. Which Popper is this? Surely not the author of ‘The Logic of Scientific Discovery’? His first attempt to uinderstand probability here is later developed (Sorry, can’t remember the reference) into a full-blown objective account, in which probabilities express actually existing propensities in the world.

Worse for your argument above, Popper’s starting point is that (‘Conjectures and Refutations’) the probablity of a non-white swan before the discovery of Australia was zero. This shows that any given scientific theory is in some way false or inadequate

]]> By: Michael Orme http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-39 Michael Orme Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:05:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-39 Sorry,must have missed something - Quote: 'There is no way to assign any positive probability to any proposition'. Which Popper is this? Surely not the author of 'The Logic of Scientific Discovery'? His first attempt to uinderstand probability here is later developed (Sorry, can't remember the reference) into a full-blown objective account, in which probabilities express actually existing propensities in the world. Worse for your argument above, Popper's starting point is that ('Conjectures and Refutations') the probablity of a non-white swan before the discovery of Australia was zero. This shows that any given scientific theory is in some way false or inadequate Sorry,must have missed something – Quote: ‘There is no way to assign any positive probability to any proposition’. Which Popper is this? Surely not the author of ‘The Logic of Scientific Discovery’? His first attempt to uinderstand probability here is later developed (Sorry, can’t remember the reference) into a full-blown objective account, in which probabilities express actually existing propensities in the world.

Worse for your argument above, Popper’s starting point is that (‘Conjectures and Refutations’) the probablity of a non-white swan before the discovery of Australia was zero. This shows that any given scientific theory is in some way false or inadequate

]]> By: Michael Orme http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-40 Michael Orme Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:05:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-40 Sorry,must have missed something - Quote: 'There is no way to assign any positive probability to any proposition'. Which Popper is this? Surely not the author of 'The Logic of Scientific Discovery'? His first attempt to uinderstand probability here is later developed (Sorry, can't remember the reference) into a full-blown objective account, in which probabilities express actually existing propensities in the world. Worse for your argument above, Popper's starting point is that ('Conjectures and Refutations') the probablity of a non-white swan before the discovery of Australia was zero. This shows that any given scientific theory is in some way false or inadequate Sorry,must have missed something – Quote: ‘There is no way to assign any positive probability to any proposition’. Which Popper is this? Surely not the author of ‘The Logic of Scientific Discovery’? His first attempt to uinderstand probability here is later developed (Sorry, can’t remember the reference) into a full-blown objective account, in which probabilities express actually existing propensities in the world.

Worse for your argument above, Popper’s starting point is that (‘Conjectures and Refutations’) the probablity of a non-white swan before the discovery of Australia was zero. This shows that any given scientific theory is in some way false or inadequate

]]> By: tablet impotence http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-27 tablet impotence Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:30:16 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-27 What<b><a href="http://tablet-impotence.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"> tablet from an impotence</a><a></a></b> is better ? What tablet from an impotence is better ?

]]> By: tablet impotence http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-35 tablet impotence Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:30:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-35 What<b><a href="http://tablet-impotence.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"> tablet from an impotence</a><a></a></b> is better ? What tablet from an impotence is better ?

]]> By: tablet impotence http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-36 tablet impotence Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:30:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-36 What<b><a href="http://tablet-impotence.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"> tablet from an impotence</a><a></a></b> is better ? What tablet from an impotence is better ?

]]> By: Gareth Morley http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-26 Gareth Morley Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:22:38 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-26 The problem disappears if you charitably take Popper to be saying that <i>universally-quantified</i> statements can only be corroborated, but not confirmed. Existential statements ("there is at least one swan that is not white") can be confirmed. The exegetical problem with this is that Popper emphasized the theory-dependence of observation. But given whatever theoretical presuppositions you need to observe the colour of swans, you can confirm that some of them aren't white. The problem disappears if you charitably take Popper to be saying that universally-quantified statements can only be corroborated, but not confirmed. Existential statements (“there is at least one swan that is not white”) can be confirmed.

The exegetical problem with this is that Popper emphasized the theory-dependence of observation. But given whatever theoretical presuppositions you need to observe the colour of swans, you can confirm that some of them aren’t white.

]]> By: Gareth Morley http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-33 Gareth Morley Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:22:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-33 The problem disappears if you charitably take Popper to be saying that <i>universally-quantified</i> statements can only be corroborated, but not confirmed. Existential statements ("there is at least one swan that is not white") can be confirmed. The exegetical problem with this is that Popper emphasized the theory-dependence of observation. But given whatever theoretical presuppositions you need to observe the colour of swans, you can confirm that some of them aren't white. The problem disappears if you charitably take Popper to be saying that universally-quantified statements can only be corroborated, but not confirmed. Existential statements (“there is at least one swan that is not white”) can be confirmed.

The exegetical problem with this is that Popper emphasized the theory-dependence of observation. But given whatever theoretical presuppositions you need to observe the colour of swans, you can confirm that some of them aren’t white.

]]> By: Gareth Morley http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/11/inter-blog-popper-wars-the-impotence/#comment-34 Gareth Morley Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:22:00 +0000 http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=89#comment-34 The problem disappears if you charitably take Popper to be saying that <i>universally-quantified</i> statements can only be corroborated, but not confirmed. Existential statements ("there is at least one swan that is not white") can be confirmed. The exegetical problem with this is that Popper emphasized the theory-dependence of observation. But given whatever theoretical presuppositions you need to observe the colour of swans, you can confirm that some of them aren't white. The problem disappears if you charitably take Popper to be saying that universally-quantified statements can only be corroborated, but not confirmed. Existential statements (“there is at least one swan that is not white”) can be confirmed.

The exegetical problem with this is that Popper emphasized the theory-dependence of observation. But given whatever theoretical presuppositions you need to observe the colour of swans, you can confirm that some of them aren’t white.

]]>