<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popper? I Don&#039;t Even Know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/09/popper-i-dont-even-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/09/popper-i-dont-even-know/</link>
	<description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 23:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anurag</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/09/popper-i-dont-even-know/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Anurag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=87#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Nice article.

When Chomsky says we don&#039;t exactly &quot;know&quot; about the innate grammar but are &quot;cognizant&quot; of it, he means that we don&#039;t have an exact knowledge of its mechanism but are aware that it exists and even use it.

Anurag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Nice article.</p>
<p>When Chomsky says we don&#8217;t exactly &#8220;know&#8221; about the innate grammar but are &#8220;cognizant&#8221; of it, he means that we don&#8217;t have an exact knowledge of its mechanism but are aware that it exists and even use it.</p>
<p>Anurag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anurag</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/09/popper-i-dont-even-know/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Anurag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=87#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Nice article.

When Chomsky says we don&#039;t exactly &quot;know&quot; about the innate grammar but are &quot;cognizant&quot; of it, he means that we don&#039;t have an exact knowledge of its mechanism but are aware that it exists and even use it.

Anurag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Nice article.</p>
<p>When Chomsky says we don&#8217;t exactly &#8220;know&#8221; about the innate grammar but are &#8220;cognizant&#8221; of it, he means that we don&#8217;t have an exact knowledge of its mechanism but are aware that it exists and even use it.</p>
<p>Anurag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anurag</title>
		<link>http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2002/01/09/popper-i-dont-even-know/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Anurag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/?p=87#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Nice article.

When Chomsky says we don&#039;t exactly &quot;know&quot; about the innate grammar but are &quot;cognizant&quot; of it, he means that we don&#039;t have an exact knowledge of its mechanism but are aware that it exists and even use it.

Anurag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Nice article.</p>
<p>When Chomsky says we don&#8217;t exactly &#8220;know&#8221; about the innate grammar but are &#8220;cognizant&#8221; of it, he means that we don&#8217;t have an exact knowledge of its mechanism but are aware that it exists and even use it.</p>
<p>Anurag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

